PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Dog in Venezuela infected with two Ehrlichia bacteria types

By Gutiérrez, Clara N et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2008·Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED-UC)·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Cultivation and molecular identification of Ehrlichia canis and Ehrlichia chaffeensis from a naturally co-infected dog in Venezuela.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A dog in Venezuela showed signs of illness due to a tick-borne infection called ehrlichiosis, which is caused by the bacteria Ehrlichia canis and Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Tests revealed that the dog had both types of bacteria in its blood. Researchers confirmed the infection using blood samples and special techniques to identify the bacteria. They also found that a healthy German Shepherd became infected after being exposed to the sick dog's blood. This study marks the first time E. chaffeensis has been reported in dogs in South America.

People also search for: dog ehrlichiosis symptoms · Ehrlichia canis treatment · tick-borne diseases in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis in Venezuela is normally performed by examination of buffy coat smears (BCS). Characteristic inclusion bodies are frequently observed in leukocytes and platelets from dogs with clinical signs of the disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the co-infection of a dog with Ehrlichia canis and E hrlichia chaffeensis using microbiological and molecular techniques. METHODS: Primary cultures of monocytes from a dog showing signs of ehrlichiosis were performed. Ehrlichial inclusions in blood cells were demonstrated by BCS and in cultured cell smears with direct immunofluorescence and Dip Quick staining. Nested PCR analysis was performed with DNA from blood samples and cultures, using primers specific for E. canis and E. chaffeensis. The amplified DNA fragments were sequenced to confirm the specificity of the amplifications. RESULTS: The BCS of the naturally infected dog contained intracellular morulae. Ehrlichial inclusions were observed 9 days after inoculation of the primary cultures. After 3 passages with monocytes from a healthy dog, 65% of infected cells, and cells with >60 morulae were observed. A healthy female German Shepherd dog, seronegative for E. canis and E. chaffeensis antigens and without contact to ticks, was inoculated with an infected culture. The animal developed signs of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis and became seropositive. Nested PCR results and sequencing of amplified DNA fragments demonstrated the simultaneous presence of E. canis and E. chaffeensis in both dogs. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of E. chaffeensis in dogs in South America. This organism was previously identified in dogs by PCR only in the United States.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18761516/