PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Using biopsy cell tests to diagnose chronic gut disease in cats

By Mangelsdorf, S et al.·Published in Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe K, Kleintiere/Heimtiere·2015·Small Animal Clinic Haar, Germany·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Cytology of endoscopically obtained biopsies for the diagnosis of chronic intestinal diseases in cats.

Species:
cat
LymphomaStomach & digestionCats

Plain-English summary

A group of cats with ongoing gastrointestinal issues underwent endoscopic biopsies to check for chronic intestinal diseases, including low-grade alimentary lymphoma (LGAL). The cytology tests performed on these biopsies were able to identify some cases of LGAL, but they were not as reliable as the traditional histopathology tests. Out of 21 cats suspected of having LGAL, only 9 were confirmed through further testing, while the rest were diagnosed with a different condition. Overall, the study found that cytology is not a strong standalone method for diagnosing LGAL in cats.

People also search for: cat gastrointestinal problems · low-grade alimentary lymphoma in cats · cat biopsy results interpretation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of cytology of endoscopically obtained biopsies in cats presented for chronic gastrointestinal complaints with emphasis on the diagnosis of low-grade alimentary lymphoma (LGAL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of endoscopically obtained duodenal biopsies from 137 cats were evaluated retrospectively. Cytology was performed using the squash smear technique with subsequent Diff Quick&#xae; staining. Pathological findings were categorized according to type and grade of the inflammatory infiltrate. Moreover, reports were reviewed with regard to diagnosis of LGAL. Histopathology reports were analysed correspondingly and compared to cytology results. Histopathological samples were further evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) if a diagnosis of LGAL had been expressed. RESULTS: Squash smear preparation of intestinal biopsies was adequate for cytological examination in >97% of cases. Using histopathology as gold standard, with cytology, a sensitivity and specificity for detection of a pathologic process in feline intestinal biopsies of 68.1% and 70.6% were calculated, respectively. Regarding the detection of lymphoplasmacytic (LPE) and eosinophilic enteritis a statistically significant correlation with histopathology (p<0.05) was observed. With regard to grade of the inflammatory infiltrate, a weak correlation was calculated (r=0.482). Of 21 cats diagnosed or suspected with LGAL by cytology, IHC confirmed nine cases whereas 11 cases were reclassified as LPE. None of the confirmed LGAL had been missed with histopathology. A sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 90.6% for cytological detection of feline LGAL was obtained. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The sensitivity of cytology to diagnose LGAL is low and it has no additional significance to histological biopsies.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25599379/