PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Deltamethrin collars reduce leishmaniasis risk in kennelled stray dogs

By Foglia Manzillo, V et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2006·Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Veterinarie, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Deltamethrin-impregnated collars for the control of canine leishmaniasis: evaluation of the protective effect and influence on the clinical outcome of Leishmania infection in kennelled stray dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of stray dogs living in an area where leishmaniasis (a disease caused by a parasite) is common were studied to see if wearing deltamethrin-impregnated collars could protect them from the disease. The study found that dogs wearing the collars had a significantly lower rate of infection compared to those without collars, with about 72% protection in the first year and 50% overall by the end of the study. Additionally, dogs that wore collars showed fewer and less severe symptoms of leishmaniasis compared to those that did not. This suggests that these collars can help reduce the risk of infection and lessen the severity of the disease if it does occur.

People also search for: dog leishmaniasis prevention collar · stray dog leishmaniasis symptoms · deltamethrin collar effectiveness

Abstract

A 2-year field study on kennelled stray dogs living in a highly endemic area of leishmaniasis was designed to evaluate whether deltamethrin-impregnated collars (Scalibor) Protector Band) could confer protection against leishmaniasis in this peculiar setting, and to assess differences in clinical outcomes between collared and uncollared dogs. A cohort of 120 clinically healthy and Leishmania-seronegative dogs was enrolled, 50% of which were collared before the 2003 transmission season, and then re-collared before the subsequent season. Collared and uncollared animals were allowed to live with infected dogs in same groups within the kennel. Follow-up included serological (IFAT) assessment twice a year with parasitological Leishmania confirmation, and clinical evaluation performed every 3 months on seroconverted dogs from both groups. Collar losses during the two seasons were high (35%). About 50% of enrolled dogs were lost at follow-up because of death or they were moved to other locations. After the 2003 season, cross-sectional serological examinations tested positive in 5 out of 44 collared animals (11.4%) and in 14 out of 34 controls (41.2%), with 72.3% estimated protection (P<0.005). After the 2004 season, 7/31 seronegative collared dogs seroconverted (22.6%) compared with 7/17 seronegative controls (41.2%), with 45.1% protection (P=0.15). At the end of the study, the cumulative rate of protection was 50.8% (P=0.005). At the clinical evaluation of 21 seroconverted dogs from both groups, canine leishmaniasis signs were significantly more frequent (90% versus 36%, P=0.017) and rapidly progressive in uncollared than in collared dogs. Reasons for such partial clinical protection in collared dogs may be found in the vector anti-feeding effect of protector bands, resulting in a lower number of infectious bites and, probably, in the reduction of antigenic stimuli necessary to shift toward a non-protective immune response.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16884851/