PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Best Holter monitor time to find heart rhythm problems in dogs

By Gunasekaran, T & Sanders, R A·Published in Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Determining the optimal Holter monitoring duration for detecting ventricular arrhythmia in dogs: a Bayesian approach.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with heart issues, including symptoms like collapsing or irregular heartbeats, underwent Holter monitoring (a type of heart rhythm test) for seven days to check for dangerous heart rhythms called ventricular arrhythmias. The study found that monitoring for three days was usually enough to detect most of these issues, while four days might be necessary for a specific type of arrhythmia. This means that if your dog is showing signs of heart problems, a three-day Holter test is likely sufficient for your vet to get a good understanding of their heart health.

People also search for: dog heart arrhythmia symptoms · Holter monitor duration for dogs · dog collapsing heart problems

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal duration of ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter) monitoring for detecting ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and to assess day-to-day spontaneous variability in dogs using seven-day recordings. ANIMALS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of dogs undergoing the consecutive seven-day Holter monitoring were retrospectively reviewed. Dogs were included if the Holter monitoring was performed for collapse, arrhythmia-related symptoms, or documented VAs on prior electrocardiography. Dogs undergoing routine breed screening or evaluated for bradyarrhythmias or supraventricular tachycardia were excluded. Day-to-day variability in VA burden was assessed using the percent coefficient of variation (CV%). Bayesian probability modeling was used to analyze arrhythmia detection from days one through seven, identifying the point at which additional monitoring provided diminishing diagnostic returns. RESULTS: Of 124 Holter recordings reviewed, 87 met inclusion criteria. The percent coefficient of variation (CV%) for daily ventricular premature complex (VPC) frequency ranged from 8 to 188%. Bayesian analysis showed that detection of >1000 VPCs, >500 VPCs, or ventricular tachycardia episodes increased within the first three days of monitoring, with minimal improvement thereafter. Detection of >100 VPCs plateaued after two days. R-on-T VPCs exhibited continued detection increases through days four to five. Dogs receiving anti-arrhythmic drugs plateaued by day 3, whereas untreated dogs showed continued detection increases up to day 5. LIMITATIONS: The study's retrospective nature, modest sample size for treated dogs, and variability in anti-arrhythmic protocols may limit generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: A three-day Holter monitoring duration is recommended for detecting most VAs in dogs, while four days may be required for R-on-T event detection.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40460590/