Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Protein in urine in dogs treated with masitinib for cancer
By Kuijlaars, M et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2021·Small Animal Hospital, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Development and progression of proteinuria in dogs treated with masitinib for neoplasia: 28 cases (2010-2019).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 28 dogs with tumors were treated with a medication called masitinib, and some developed proteinuria (excess protein in urine) within the first month of treatment. Out of the dogs that were not proteinuric before starting, 18% showed signs of proteinuria soon after beginning the medication. However, none of the dogs experienced severe complications like kidney failure or significant weight loss due to this issue. For those with pre-existing proteinuria, the treatment did not worsen their condition. Regular monitoring of urine protein levels is recommended during the first month of treatment to catch any changes early.
People also search for: dog proteinuria treatment · masitinib side effects in dogs · dog urine protein levels after medication
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence, severity and progression of proteinuria over the first 6 months of masitinib treatment in tumour-bearing dogs without pre-existing proteinuria. To describe the effect of treatment on urine protein:creatinine and renal parameters in patients with pre-existing proteinuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records were reviewed from patients receiving masitinib for neoplasms between June 1, 2010, and May 5, 2019. Patients without pre-treatment and at least one urine protein:creatinine after ≥7 days treatment were excluded. Signalment, tumours and concurrent diseases, treatments, haematology, biochemistry and urinalysis results before, during and after treatment for up to 202 days were collected. Patient visits were grouped into six timepoints for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight dogs were included. Eighteen percent of dogs non-proteinuric at baseline (four of 22) developed proteinuria during treatment, all within 1 month of treatment initiation. One dog developed hypoalbuminaemia, none developed oedema or ascites, azotaemia or were euthanased/died due to proteinuria. Masitinib was immediately discontinued in both dogs in which urine protein:creatinine greater than 2.0 was detected and in both, proteinuria improved. Six dogs with pre-treatment proteinuria were treated with masitinib, significant worsening of proteinuria did not occur. Neither azotaemia nor severe hypoalbuminaemia occurred. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Proteinuria, when it occurs, tends to develop within 1 month of masitinib commencement and may progress rapidly. Weekly proteinuria monitoring should be considered for the first month and a urine protein:creatinine greater than 0.5 should prompt reassessment within 1 week. Masitinib treatment can be considered in patients with pre-treatment proteinuria and does not inevitably cause worsening of proteinuria.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33634470/