Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How vets measure brain inflammation severity in dogs
By Gonçalves, Rita et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2023·Department of Veterinary Science, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Development of a reliable clinical assessment tool for meningoencephalitis in dogs: The neurodisability scale.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO), which causes serious inflammation in the brain, were assessed using a new scoring system called the neurodisability scale (NDS). This scale helps veterinarians evaluate the severity of neurological symptoms like seizures and balance issues. The study found that the NDS provided reliable results when used by different assessors, but it did not show a clear link between the scores and long-term recovery outcomes. This means while the NDS can help gauge how severe a dog's condition is, it doesn't predict how well they will do in the future.
People also search for: dog meningoencephalitis symptoms · dog seizure treatment · neurological assessment for dogs · how to help a dog with brain inflammation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO) comprises a group of debilitating inflammatory diseases affecting the central nervous system of dogs. Currently, no validated clinical scale is available for the objective assessment of MUO severity. OBJECTIVES: Design a neurodisability scale (NDS) to grade clinical severity and determine its reliability and whether or not the score at presentation correlates with outcome. ANIMALS: One hundred dogs with MUO were included for retrospective review and 31 dogs were subsequently enrolled for prospective evaluation. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 100 dogs diagnosed with MUO to identify the most frequent neurological examination findings. The NDS was designed based on these results and evaluated for prospective and retrospective use in a new population of MUO patients (n = 31) by different groups of independent blinded assessors, including calculation of interobserver agreement and association with outcome. RESULTS: The most common clinical signs in MUO patients were used to inform categories for scoring in the NDS: seizure activity, ambulatory status, posture and cerebral, cerebellar, brainstem, and visual functions. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for prospective use of the NDS was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.91) indicating good agreement, and moderate agreement was found between prospective and retrospective assessors (ICC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83). No association was found between NDS score and long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The NDS is a novel clinical measure for objective assessment of neurological dysfunction and showed good reliability when used prospectively in MUO patients but, in this small population, no association with outcome could be identified.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37092590/