Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How accurate is OCT for checking dog soft tissue sarcoma surgery
By Dornbusch, Josephine A et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2021·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for assessing surgical margins of canine soft tissue sarcomas in observers of different specialties.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 25 dogs with soft tissue sarcomas (a type of cancer) had their tumors surgically removed, and researchers used a special imaging technique called optical coherence tomography (OCT) to check the surgical margins for any remaining cancer cells. The OCT showed a high accuracy rate in identifying cancerous and non-cancerous tissues, with sensitivity rates of about 88% for live tissues and 82% for removed tissues. This means that veterinarians from different specialties could effectively learn to use this technology to ensure all cancerous tissue is removed during surgery. The study suggests that OCT could be a valuable tool in improving cancer surgery outcomes for dogs.
People also search for: dog soft tissue sarcoma treatment · optical coherence tomography for dogs · how to check for cancer in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess surgical margins of canine soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and determine the influence of observer specialty and training. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded clinical prospective study. ANIMALS: Twenty-five dogs undergoing surgical excision of STS. METHODS: In vivo and ex vivo surgical margins were imaged with OCT after tumor resection. Representative images and videos were used to generate a training presentation and data sets. These were completed by 16 observers of four specialties (surgery, radiology, pathology, and OCT researchers). Images and videos from data sets were classified as cancerous or noncancerous. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity were 88.2% and 92.8%, respectively, for in vivo tissues and 82.5% and 93.3%, respectively, for ex vivo specimens. The overall accurate classification for all specimens was 91.4% in vivo and 89.5% ex vivo. There was no difference in accuracy of interpretation of OCT imaging by observers of different specialties or experience levels. CONCLUSION: Use of OCT to accurately assess surgical margins after STS excision was associated with a high sensitivity and specificity among various specialties. Personnel of all specialties and experience levels could effectively be trained to interpret OCT imaging. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Optical coherence tomography can be used by personnel of different specialty experience levels and from various specialties to accurately identify canine STS in vivo and ex vivo after a short training session. These encouraging results provide evidence to justify further research to assess the ability of OCT to provide real-time assessments of surgical margins and its applicability to other neoplasms.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32916007/