Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How blood tests find M-proteins in dogs with myeloma
By Moore, A Russell et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2021·Department of Microbiology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Diagnostic performance of routine electrophoresis and immunofixation for the detection of immunoglobulin paraproteins (M-Proteins) in dogs with multiple myeloma and related disorders: Part 2-Toward improved diagnostic performance.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with multiple myeloma and related disorders had their blood tested for specific proteins called M-proteins, which can indicate serious health issues. Researchers found that certain features in the blood tests, like low levels of a type of antibody (hypogammaglobulinemia) or unusually high peaks in the test results, were linked to the presence of M-proteins. By combining different testing methods, they improved the accuracy of diagnosing these conditions, achieving a high sensitivity of 95.1%. This means that most dogs with M-proteins were correctly identified, helping veterinarians provide better care.
People also search for: dog multiple myeloma symptoms · M-proteins in dogs · dog blood test results interpretation
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic performance of routine electrophoresis (agarose gel electrophoresis [AGE] and capillary zone electrophoresis [CZE]) and species-specific immunofixation (IF) for the detection of immunoglobulin paraproteins (M-proteins) and diagnosis of secretory myeloma-related disorders (sMRD) can be improved. Available canine IF targets were IgG-FC, IgA, IgM, light chain (LC), IgG4, and free LC (fLC) antibodies. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review specific features associated with the presence of M-proteins in canine serum samples and the common features causing inaccurate reporting of M-proteins to improve the diagnostic performance of routine electrophoresis and IF for the detection of M-proteins. METHODS: Features found in AGE, CZE, routine IF, IgG4 IF, and fLC IF of 100 canine serum samples from Part 1 of this study were evaluated by simple and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the presence of M-proteins. Cases falsely called negative or positive for M-proteins were reviewed to identify the common features that could be used to increase the diagnostic performance of SPE and IF for M-protein detection. RESULTS: The presence of hypogammaglobulinemia or any peak taller than albumin was associated with an M-protein. Total protein concentrations, globulin concentrations, or peaks wider than albumin were not associated with an M-protein. Free LC sMRD cases were not diagnosed by SPE and routine IF. Cases with infectious and inflammatory etiologies had a restricted polyclonal gammopathy with multiple γ-globulin restrictions resulting in some false-positive results. SPE combined with all available IF results and the specific features identified in this study had an estimated sensitivity of 95.1% and specificity of 81.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The identified criteria of this study increase the diagnostic performance of the electrophoretic evaluation for M-proteins.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33855710/