Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Intravenous levetiracetam helps control seizures in dogs with status
By Hardy, B T et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2012·University of Minnesota, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Double-masked, placebo-controlled study of intravenous levetiracetam for the treatment of status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Nineteen dogs experiencing status epilepticus (SE) or acute repetitive seizures (ARS) were treated with either intravenous levetiracetam (LEV) or a placebo after receiving standard care with diazepam. The dogs that received LEV had a significantly higher success rate, with 56% showing no further seizures compared to just 10% in the placebo group. Additionally, dogs on LEV needed fewer doses of diazepam to control their seizures. Overall, LEV was found to be safe and may be an effective option for managing these serious seizure conditions in dogs.
People also search for: dog seizure treatment · status epilepticus in dogs · levetiracetam for dogs seizures · dog emergency seizure care
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) and acute repetitive seizures (ARS) are common canine neurologic emergencies. No evidence-based studies are available to guide treatment in veterinary patients. Parenteral levetiracetam (LEV) has many favorable properties for the emergency treatment of seizures, but its safety and efficacy in dogs for SE and ARS are unknown. HYPOTHESIS: Intravenous LEV is superior to placebo in controlling seizures in dogs with SE or ARS after treatment with IV diazepam. ANIMALS: Nineteen client-owned dogs admitted for SE or ARS. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked study. Dogs with SE or ARS were randomized to receive IV LEV (30 or 60 mg/kg using an adaptive dose-escalation approach) or placebo, in addition to standard of care treatment. They were monitored for at least 24 hours after admission for additional seizures. RESULTS: The responder rate (defined as dogs with no additional seizures after administration of the study medication) after LEV was 56% compared with 10% for placebo (P = .06). Dogs in the placebo group required significantly more boluses of diazepam compared with the LEV group (P < .03). Seizure etiologies identified were idiopathic epilepsy (n = 10), inflammatory central nervous system disease (n = 4), intracranial neoplasia (n = 2), hepatic encephalopathy (n = 1), and 2 dogs had no cause determined. No serious adverse effects were attributable to LEV administration. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: LEV was safe and potentially effective for the treatment of SE and ARS in these client-owned dogs. Larger, controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm this preliminary observation.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22295898/