PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How contrast thickness and massage affect dog lymph node scans

By Grimes, Janet A et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative oncology·2021·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Effect of contrast agent viscosity and massage on success of computed tomography lymphangiography with aqueous contrast for sentinel lymph node identification in healthy dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of healthy dogs underwent a special imaging test called CT lymphangiography to help identify sentinel lymph nodes, which are important for cancer staging. The researchers tested different types of contrast agents with varying thicknesses to see if they affected the success of the procedure. While they found that the thickness of the contrast agents didn't significantly change the success rate of identifying the lymph nodes, they did discover that massaging the injection site helped improve the flow of the contrast through the lymphatic system. Based on these findings, it's suggested that massage can be beneficial during this imaging process, but no specific contrast agent was found to be better than the others.

People also search for: dog cancer staging lymph nodes · CT lymphangiography for dogs · improving lymphatic flow in dogs

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation is important for accurate cancer staging. Computed tomography (CT) lymphangiography with aqueous contrast is a feasible technique for SLN identification in dogs. Although most studies report success rates around 90%, success rates as low as 60% have been reported. One reason for low success rates may be the difference in viscosity of the various agents used in comparison to normal lymph viscosity. The objective of this study was to evaluate contrast agents of differing viscosities for use in CT lymphangiography for SLN identification and to determine the influence of massage on contrast flow rates. The hypothesis was that lower viscosity agents would have a higher success rate and faster time to identification of the SLN than higher viscosity agents and that massage would increase contrast flow rates. Dogs were anaesthetised and CT lymphangiography was performed with four contrast agents of differing viscosities in a randomized crossover design. Injections were made on the dorsal pes bilaterally on two study days and the popliteal lymph nodes were evaluated for contrast uptake. There was no significant difference in success of SLN identification or time to SLN identification among the four agents. Massage of the injection site increased rate of contrast flow through the lymphatics. No specific recommendation for one contrast agent over another can be made with these results. Massage is recommended to improve lymphatic flow when performing CT lymphangiography with aqueous contrast in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33876559/