Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How light therapy affects dog skin cells with Staph infection
By Lundberg, Annette T et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2026·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Effect of Fluorescence Photobiomodulation on Canine Progenitor Epidermal Keratinocytes With and Without Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Colonisation.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at how fluorescence photobiomodulation (FPB) treatment affects skin cells from dogs, particularly those with a common skin bacteria called Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. The researchers found that FPB might slightly reduce inflammation in skin cells infected with this bacteria, but it didn't harm the cells or significantly reduce the bacteria count. This suggests that FPB could be a gentle option for treating skin issues in dogs, though more research is needed to confirm its effectiveness.
People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · fluorescence photobiomodulation for dogs · Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence photobiomodulation (FPB) is a treatment for canine dermatitis, yet no studies exist assessing its effect on canine keratinocytes in vitro. OBJECTIVES: To determine: (i) the anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effect of FPB on canine progenitor epidermal keratinocytes (CPEK) with and without colonisation by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (SP); (ii) changes in CPEK viability following FPB exposure; and (iii) SP colony count following FPB exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Keratinocytes were grown in chamber slides, with and without SP, and treated with two, 2 min exposures to FPB. Supernatant was collected at 0, 1, 6, and 24 h post-FPB to evaluate cytokines (interleukin [IL]-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, IL-18, interferon-γ induced protein 10 [IP-10], tumour necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ, keratinocyte chemotactic-like, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1), and host defence peptides (β-defensin 3-like and cathelicidin) secretion. Cell cytotoxicity was assessed via lactate dehydrogenase and adenosine triphosphate assays. The supernatant pellet was collected at 0 and 24 h, resuspended, and plated. Bacterial colonies were counted after 24 h of incubation. Experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated five times. RESULTS: At 6 h post-FPB, IP-10 fluorescence intensity was mildly yet significantly decreased in CPEK+SP (p = 0.04). No other statistically significant differences were found for cytokine, β-defensin, cathelicidin, or SP colony counts. A lack of cytotoxicity was observed post-FPB over a 24 h period. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fluorescence photobiomodulation may have a mild anti-inflammatory effect on CPEKs colonised by SP in vitro based on the significant decrease in IP-10 production 6 h post-FBP exposure, yet does not affect CPEK cell viability.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42082164/