Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
PIND-ORF treatment helps dogs recover faster from parvovirus infection
By Proksch, A L et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2014·Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Germany·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Efficacy of the paramunity inducer PIND-ORF in the treatment of canine parvovirus infection.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of young dogs diagnosed with canine parvovirus (CPV) infection received either a new treatment called PIND-ORF or a placebo to see if it would help them recover faster. While the dogs treated with PIND-ORF showed some increase in certain immune cells and antibody levels, there was no significant difference in recovery time or overall health compared to those who received the placebo. Unfortunately, three dogs in the placebo group did not survive, but the overall survival rates were similar between the two groups. Ultimately, PIND-ORF did not show a clear benefit in treating CPV infection.
People also search for: dog parvovirus treatment · PIND-ORF for dogs · young dog vomiting and diarrhea · canine parvovirus recovery time
Abstract
Canine parvovirus (CPV) infection is a common and severe disease particularly affecting young dogs. The paramunity inducer PIND-ORF is reported to stimulate the innate immune system and, if used as a supplementary medication, might lead to a more rapid improvement in clinical signs in dogs with CPV infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PIND-ORF in dogs with CPV infection in a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial using 38 dogs randomly assigned to two groups. Inclusion criteria were clinical signs consistent with CPV infection and a positive faecal CPV PCR. Dogs received either PIND-ORF (n = 20) or placebo (n = 18) and additional symptomatic treatment. Time to recovery and mortality rate were compared between the two groups. Clinical signs, complete blood counts (CBC), and serum protein and albumin concentrations were evaluated daily during hospitalisation and on day 14. Viral shedding and antibody titres were measured by faecal CPV PCR and serum neutralisation assay. There was no significant difference in time to recovery, clinical signs, blood parameters, duration of virus shedding, and antibody titres between the two groups. The only significant difference was an increase in lymphocyte counts and antibody titres observed in the PIND-ORF group only. Three dogs receiving placebo did not survive, but the mortality rate was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.097). No significant effect of PIND-ORF on recovery and outcome could be demonstrated.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25218850/