Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Urine dipstick test accuracy for protein in dog urine samples
By Zatelli, Andrea et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2010·Clinica Veterinaria Pirani, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of a urine dipstick test for confirmation or exclusion of proteinuria in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at how well a urine dipstick test can detect protein in the urine of dogs, which is important for diagnosing kidney problems. The test was found to be very sensitive, meaning it correctly identified most dogs with proteinuria (excess protein in urine), especially when a specific cutoff was used. However, it wasn't as reliable for ruling out proteinuria in dogs with low urine concentration. For dogs with a certain urine concentration and a positive dipstick result, further testing with a urine protein-to-creatinine (UPC) ratio is recommended to confirm the diagnosis.
People also search for: dog protein in urine test · urine dipstick test for dogs · dog kidney problems symptoms
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a urine dipstick test as a possible replacement for urine protein-to-creatinine (UPC) ratio for identifying proteinuria in dogs. SAMPLE POPULATION: 507 urine samples from adult dogs. PROCEDURES: Urine dipstick, UPC ratio, specific gravity (USG), and sediment testing were performed on 507 samples. With UPC ratio as the reference criterion, diagnostic accuracy of the urine dipstick test was calculated for the entire data set and for urine samples grouped by USG (< or = 1.012 or > 1.012; < 1.030 or > or = 1.030). A UPC ratio < 0.2 was used to indicate absence of proteinuria. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the urine dipstick test for detection of proteinuria was > 90% when 0 mg of protein/dL (a 0+ result) was used to indicate a negative test result, and the specificity ranged from 40% to 60%, depending on the USG. Sensitivity decreased to a range of 56% to 81% when 30 mg of protein/dL (a 1+ result) was used as the cutoff, depending on the USG, but the specificity increased to > 90%. The likelihood of correctly identifying nonproteinuric dogs was low when the USG was < or = 1.012, particularly when samples with a 1+ result were considered negative. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For dogs with a dipstick-test result of 1+ and USG < or = 1.012, proteinuria should be assessed by use of the UPC ratio; dogs with a USG value > 1.012 are likely nonproteinuric. When used together, the urine dipstick test and USG measurement were reliable as a rapid alternative to UPC ratio determination in dogs in this study.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20113233/