PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Rapid test to detect Toxoplasma antibodies in cats

By Villanueva-Saz, Sergio et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2023·Department of Animal Pathology, Spain·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of an immunochromatographic serologic test to detect the presence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in cats.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of cats was tested for Toxoplasma gondii, a parasite that can cause illness, using a new rapid test. The study involved 292 cats, some of which were healthy and some had varying levels of antibodies against the parasite. The rapid test showed very high accuracy, with nearly 99% sensitivity and 100% specificity, meaning it was very reliable in detecting the presence of the parasite. This test could be a great option for veterinarians when traditional lab tests aren't available, providing quick and accurate results for diagnosing toxoplasmosis in cats.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmosis is a protozoan disease caused by Toxoplasma gondii. Different T. gondii confirmatory techniques, including serologic methods, are available to detect the presence of the parasite. Among serology techniques, immunochromatographic rapid testing could be a reliable alternative to serologic laboratory techniques. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a commercial immunochromatographic test (FASTest TOXOPLASMA g) in seronegative and seropositive cats. METHODS: Two indirect immunofluorescence antibody reference tests, an in-house technique, and a commercial test were used to classify 292 feline serum samples. The rapid test was evaluated in different groups of cats, including healthy seronegative cats (n = 121), seropositive cats with variable anti-Toxoplasma antibodies (n = 146), and cats with positive serologic results for other pathogens (n = 25). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, receiver operating characteristic curves, and kappa statistics were analyzed as performance measures. RESULTS: Of the 292 samples, 146 were classified as T. gondii seropositive and 146 as T. gondii seronegative. Concordant results were obtained for all samples using immunofluorescence antibody tests. The diagnostic measures of this rapid test showed 98.63% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and 99.32% accuracy. The kappa statistics value was 0.986, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.993. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid test showed diagnostic measurements similar to those of traditional quantitative serologic methods. In situations where laboratory techniques are not available, this test, under clinical conditions, could be a useful alternative to obtain accurate results rapidly.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36849629/