Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Cold microwave plasma effects on dog skin hydration and safety
By Lee, Na-Eun et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2022·Laboratory of Veterinary Dermatology and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, South Korea·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of cold atmospheric microwave plasma on skin physiological parameters and tolerability in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Twenty dogs with normal skin were treated with cold atmospheric microwave plasma (CAMP) to see how it affected their skin and if it was safe. After treatment, the dogs showed improved hydration and reduced water loss from their skin, especially with longer treatment times. Most dogs tolerated the procedure well, with only mild redness noted in some cases. This suggests that CAMP could be a safe and effective option for treating skin infections and wounds in dogs.
People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · cold plasma therapy for dogs · skin hydration in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cold atmospheric microwave plasma (CAMP) is a promising therapeutic option for treating skin infections and wounds. Changes in biophysical skin parameters and the tolerability in dogs after applying CAMP is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo effects of CAMP on skin biophysical parameters [hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and surface temperature] and tolerability in dogs. ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned dogs with normal skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cold atmospheric microwave plasma treatment was performed for 30 s and 1, 2 and 4 min, respectively, at different sites of normal canine skin in the inguinal area. Hydration, TEWL and surface temperature were measured five, three and three times, respectively, before and after CAMP application. After treatment, pain and adverse effects were evaluated using a modified Melbourne Pain Scale and the modified short form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (modified CMPS-SF). RESULTS: Transepidermal water loss values significantly decreased with 4 min of treatment, and hydration decreased significantly with 2 min of treatment. Temperature increased significantly with increasing treatment time. For other parameters, no significant changes were observed. No significant pain response or adverse effects were observed in most dogs, aside from mild erythema in the treatment area after 4 min. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Cold atmospheric microwave plasma treatment was well-tolerated and did not significantly change canine skin biophysical parameters. CAMP achieves basic recommendations for safe use and is a potential therapeutic option for various skin diseases in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35635293/