Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How DPP and SNAP rapid tests detect Leishmania in dogs
By Celeste da Silva Freitas de Souza et al.·Published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical·View original on DOAJ →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of DPP® and SNAP® Rapid Tests for diagnosis of Leishmania infantum canine infections
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected of having leishmaniasis (a disease caused by a parasite) were tested using two different rapid tests: the DPP® and SNAP® tests. Both tests showed very similar results, with the SNAP® test detecting the infection with 96.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while the DPP® test had 95.8% sensitivity and also 100% specificity. This means that both tests are reliable for diagnosing leishmaniasis in dogs. If your dog is showing symptoms of this disease, either test can be a good option for your veterinarian to confirm the infection.
People also search for: dog leishmaniasis symptoms · SNAP test for dog leishmaniasis · DPP test for dog infection
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis is a disease that affects humans, wildlife, and domestic species. Since dogs play a key role in urban Leishmania spp. transmission, the Brazilian government maintains the Monitoring and Control Program of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VLMCP) in endemic regions, which promotes awareness campaigns aiming to enhance the control of the infection. The VLMCP recommends the Dual Path Platform (DPP®) canine visceral leishmaniasis test (Bio-Manguinhos, Brazil) for screening and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to confirm the infection. The DPP® test is produced and distributed by the Health Ministry to the Municipal Health Centers responsible for the local VLMCP. The test is not available to all the clinics, forcing some veterinarians to use other rapid tests for screening and diagnosis of this disease in their daily routine. METHODS: The present study was conducted to compare the performance of the DPP® and SNAP® tests using sera from the dogs with confirmed infections of L. infantum and from the dogs with no previous testing, residing in areas with a low Leishmania infection. RESULTS: There was 97.0% agreement between the two tests. Sensitivity and specificity of the SNAP® test were 96.3% and 100%, respectively. Agreement between both the antibody tests and the parasitological detection methods was 96.8%. The DPP® test had 95.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The SNAP® and the DPP® tests were virtually equivalent in terms of detection of canine antibodies against L. infantum, and both the tests demonstrated high and similar levels of sensitivity and specificity.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0154-2019