PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Safety of intermittent hemodialysis with bypass in dogs with kidney

By de Azevedo, Maria Gabriela Picelli et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2025·Department of Veterinary Clinics, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of intermittent hemodialysis therapy in the bypass mode in dogs with chronic kidney disease in uremic crisis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 14 dogs with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a serious condition called uremic crisis were treated with a type of kidney therapy known as intermittent hemodialysis. Some dogs received the treatment with a special bypass mode, while others did not. Both groups showed improvements in their kidney function markers, but the bypass group had a lower body weight after treatment. Overall, the study found that using the bypass mode during hemodialysis was safe and effective for these dogs, helping to reduce complications without causing additional health issues.

People also search for: dog kidney disease treatment · hemodialysis for dogs · chronic kidney disease in dogs · uremic crisis in dogs · dog kidney failure symptoms

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the safety of intermittent hemodialysis via the bypass mode in dogs with chronic kidney disease during uremic crisis. RESULTS: Fourteen dogs with chronic kidney disease in uremic crisis were selected. The dogs were allocated into two experimental groups: intermittent hemodialysis without bypass mode (IHD group without bypass) and intermittent hemodialysis with bypass mode (IHD group with bypass). Data were collected during the first dialysis session at 10 min pre-session (M0), 30 min (M1), 60 min (M2), 120 min (M3), 180 min (M4), and 240 min (M5) after the session began and 10 min post-session (M6). An increase in rectal temperature was observed at certain moments in both groups. The hemogram revealed a decrease in red blood cells, total protein, and platelets in both groups, whereas hemoglobin and hematocrit decreased at M6 only in the IHD group with bypass. Urea, creatinine, and phosphorus were reduced at M6 in both groups. An increase in blood pH, sodium bicarbonate, and excess base at M6 (10 min post-session) was observed in both groups. The IHD group with bypass exhibited a significantly lower body weight. No significant differences were observed in session time or final URR between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the hypothesis that IHD with the bypass mode is safe and effective in CKD dogs with uremic crisis. This approach minimizes complications such as dialysis disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) while not causing hemodynamic or laboratory impairments under the executed conditions.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40269838/