PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Diagnosing visceral leishmaniasis in seropositive dogs in Brazil

By Regina-Silva, Shara et al.·Published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical·2014·Laborat&#xf3, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of parasitological examination, kDNA polymerase chain reaction and rK39-based immunochromatography for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in seropositive dogs from the screening-culling program in Brazil.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 44 dogs in Brazil, some showing symptoms and others not, were tested for visceral leishmaniasis, a serious disease that can affect both dogs and humans. The tests included checking for the parasite directly, using a DNA test, and an immunochromatographic test (ICT). The ICT was the most effective, showing positive results in 77.3% of cases, while the direct parasite detection was the least effective. Overall, most dogs tested positive for at least one test, highlighting the need for better diagnostic methods, especially for dogs that don't show symptoms.

People also search for: dog leishmaniasis symptoms · how to test for leishmaniasis in dogs · treatment for leishmaniasis in dogs

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dogs play a primary role in the zoonotic cycle of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Therefore, the accurate diagnosis of infected dogs, primarily asymptomatic dogs, is crucial to the efficiency of VL control programs. METHODS: We investigated the agreement of four diagnostic tests for canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL): parasite detection, either after myeloculture or by direct microscopic examination of tissue imprints; kinetoplast-deoxyribonucleic acid-polymerase chain reaction (kDNA-PCR); and an immunochromatographic test (ICT). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an indirect immunofluorescence test (IFAT), both of which were adopted as part of the screening-culling program in Brazil, were used as reference tests. Our sample set consisted of 44 seropositive dogs, 25 of which were clinically asymptomatic and 19 were symptomatic for CVL according to ELISA-IFAT. RESULTS: The highest and lowest test co-positivities were observed for ICT (77.3%) and myeloculture (58.1%), respectively. When analyzed together, the overall percentage of co-positive tests was significantly higher for the symptomatic group compared to the asymptomatic group. However, only ICT was significantly different based on the results of a separate analysis per test for each group of dogs. The majority (93.8%) of animals exhibited at least one positive test result, with an average of 2.66 positive tests per dog. Half of the symptomatic dogs tested positive for all four tests administered. CONCLUSIONS: The variability between test results reinforces the need for more efficient and reliable methods to accurately diagnose canine VL, particularly in asymptomatic animals.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25229287/