Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Effectiveness of second surgery for soft tissue sarcoma in dogs
By Bacon, Nicholas J et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2007·College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of primary re-excision after recent inadequate resection of soft tissue sarcomas in dogs: 41 cases (1999-2004).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 41 dogs with soft tissue sarcomas that were not completely removed underwent a second surgery to excise the remaining tumor. After the follow-up period, about 15% of the dogs had local recurrence of the tumor, and 10% developed distant metastasis. The surgery aimed to remove any remaining cancerous tissue, and it was found that having some residual tumor in the scar did not necessarily predict future problems. Most dogs had a good long-term outcome without needing radiation therapy or amputation.
People also search for: dog soft tissue sarcoma treatment · dog tumor re-excision · what to expect after dog surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of primary re-excision alone for treatment of soft tissue sarcomas after recent incomplete resection, the frequency and clinical importance of detecting residual tumor in resected scars, and prognostic factors associated with the procedure. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 41 dogs. PROCEDURES: Medical records of dogs that had undergone recent incomplete excision of a soft tissue sarcoma at a referring veterinary practice and subsequent re-excision of the scar at the Colorado State University Veterinary Medical Center were reviewed. Owners and referring veterinarians were contacted for follow-up information. Slides from re-excised specimens were reviewed. Dogs that underwent radiation therapy after the re-excision procedure were excluded. RESULTS: 41 dogs met the inclusion criteria, and long-term follow-up information was available for 39 dogs. Median follow-up time was 816 days. Local recurrence of tumor developed in 6 of 39 (15%) dogs, and distant metastasis occurred in 4 of 39 (10%) dogs. Healthy tissue margins of 0.5 to 3.5 cm were achieved at re-excision. Residual tumor was identified in 9 of 41 (22%) resected scars. No tumor-, patient-, or treatment-related variables were associated with local recurrence except for the presence of liposarcoma or fibrosarcoma or whether fine-needle aspiration had been performed prior to surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: After incomplete resection of soft tissue sarcomas, resection of local tissue should be performed, even if excisable tissue margins appear narrow. A long-term favorable prognosis is achievable without radiation therapy or amputation. The presence of residual tumor in resected scar tissue should not be used to predict local recurrence.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17302554/