Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using implantable loop recorders to diagnose unexplained fainting
By Santilli, Roberto A et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2010·Clinica Veterinaria Malpensa, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evaluation of the diagnostic value of an implantable loop recorder in dogs with unexplained syncope.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 12 dogs with unexplained fainting episodes (syncope) had an implantable loop recorder (ILR) surgically placed to monitor their heart activity. Over the following months, the device was activated in 7 of the dogs, revealing various heart rhythm issues that could explain their fainting. Some dogs experienced heart rate changes that coincided with their episodes, while others showed no further fainting after getting the ILR. The device helped identify potential heart problems in most cases, but routine monitoring did not provide additional useful information.
People also search for: dog fainting episodes · implantable loop recorder for dogs · dog heart rhythm problems
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) in dogs with unexplained syncope. DESIGN: Prospective case series. ANIMALS: 12 dogs with recurrent unexplained syncope. PROCEDURES: An ILR was surgically inserted in a pocket created in the subcutaneous tissues of the left hemithorax of each dog. The ILRs were programmed for manual and automatic activation, and event analysis and programming were performed at 3-month intervals and after each syncopal episode. RESULTS: The ILR was manually activated in 7 of 12 dogs at least once within 45 to 218 days (median, 120 days) after implantation. Four dogs had syncopal episodes associated with sinus tachycardia followed by sinus bradycardia and asystolic pauses. Two dogs had ventricular tachycardia, and 1 dog had sinus node dysfunction with prolonged sinus arrest that coincided with loss of consciousness and falling. Four dogs had no additional syncopal episodes after implantation of the ILR. In the remaining dog, the owner was unable to activate the ILR during the only syncopal episode observed for that dog after ILR implantation. In all 12 dogs, analysis of ECG traces after automatic activation of recording revealed normal cardiac rhythms. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Data gained after manual activation of an ILR provided valuable diagnostic and prognostic information in almost all dogs with unexplained syncopal episodes by confirming or disproving an association between syncope and arrhythmias. However, detection of disturbances in cardiac rhythm after automatic activation did not appear to improve the diagnostic value for an ILR implanted in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20043804/