PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Safety of spinosad and milbemycin in Collies with MDR1 mutation

By Sherman, Jeffrey G et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2010·Elanco Animal Health, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Evaluation of the safety of spinosad and milbemycin 5-oxime orally administered to Collies with the MDR1 gene mutation.

Species:
dog
Movement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

Twenty adult Collies with a genetic mutation that makes them sensitive to certain medications were tested to see if a new treatment would cause any harmful effects. They received either spinosad alone or a combination of spinosad and milbemycin over several days. After careful observation, none of the dogs showed any signs of toxicity, such as depression or coordination problems, which are common with their sensitivity. This means that the new treatment is likely safe for these dogs.

People also search for: Collie MDR1 gene mutation treatment · spinosad safety for dogs · milbemycin side effects in Collies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether signs of avermectin (AVM)-milbemycin (MB) toxicosis would be evident in AVM-MB-sensitive Collies after treatment with an experimental formulation of spinosad alone or spinosad combined with MB 5-oxime (MBO) at doses up to 5 and 10 times the MBO maximum label dose. ANIMALS: 20 adult Collies homozygous or heterozygous for the MDR1 gene mutation that had signs of toxicosis after oral administration of ivermectin. PROCEDURES: On the basis of AVM-MB sensitivity score, each dog was assigned in a randomized block design to 1 of 5 treatment groups (control group, 300 mg of spinosad/kg [5 times maximum label dose], 180 mg of spinosad/kg with 3 mg of MBO/kg [3 times maximum MBO label dose], 300 mg of spinosad/kg with 5 mg of MBO/kg, and 300 mg of spinosad/kg with 10 mg of MBO/kg). Treatments were administered orally as a sequence of single doses during 5 consecutive days. After a 28-day washout period, treatment sequences were repeated. Posttreatment observation and scoring by blinded observers were conducted to specifically include neurologic abnormalities typical of AVM-MB toxicosis, such as signs of depression, ataxia, mydriasis, and hypersalivation. RESULTS: No signs of AVM-MB toxicosis were attributed to treatment in any dog during the study. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that oral administration of spinosad at 300 mg/kg alone or in combination with MBO at doses up to 10 mg/kg did not cause signs of AVM-MB toxicosis in AVM-MB-sensitive dogs with the MDR1 gene mutation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20043790/