Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How brain MRI changes in dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis
By Soulé, Carole et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2025·Department of Diagnostic Imaging, France·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Evolution of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions in Dogs Treated for Meningoencephalomyelitis of Unknown Origin Between Initial Diagnosis and Relapse.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
An 8-year-old Beagle was treated for meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO), which caused symptoms like seizures and behavioral changes. After initial treatment, the dog underwent MRI scans to monitor brain lesions, and while some lesions improved, new ones developed after about 7 months. The study found that repeat MRIs are important for detecting these new lesions and understanding the dog's condition. The Beagle's treatment involved immunosuppressive medications, and while some dogs showed improvement, relapses can occur, making ongoing monitoring crucial.
People also search for: dog seizures treatment · Beagle meningoencephalitis MRI · dog brain lesions symptoms
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The response of meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO) in dogs to immunosuppressive treatment is unpredictable, and relapses frequently occur. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe the evolution of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions in dogs treated for MUO from diagnosis to relapse and to define the diagnostic and clinical value of repeat MRI at relapse. ANIMALS: Eighteen dogs treated for MUO that experienced relapse and underwent MRI both at disease onset and relapse. METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal, case series study. Dogs were identified from medical records between 2015 and 2024. The MR images were reviewed by radiologists for lesion number, location, size, pre- and post-contrast signal aspect, meningeal enhancement, mass effect, perilesional edema, and evidence of intracranial hypertension. RESULTS: Median interval between MRIs was 259 days (range, 31-876 days). In dogs with relapse delay < 157 days, lesion number tended to decrease. Residual lesions tended to enlarge and exhibit contrast enhancement and perilesional edema (suggesting an active pathologic process), but without development of new lesions. After 233 days, all dogs had developed new lesions. Half exhibited enlarged active residual lesions, whereas the others showed either remission or smaller inactive lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Before a clinical relapse at approximately 6 months, remission of the initial pathologic process and development of new lesions appear unlikely. Beyond this period, new lesions may occur with or without remission of the initial pathologic process, and repeat MRI is of high diagnostic and clinical value in detecting new lesions and characterizing the underlying pathologic process.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40213932/