Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Leishmania vaccine did not protect beagle dogs from infection
By Gradoni, L et al.·Published in Vaccine·2005·Dipartimento di Malattie Infettive, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Failure of a multi-subunit recombinant leishmanial vaccine (MML) to protect dogs from Leishmania infantum infection and to prevent disease progression in infected animals.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of beagle dogs in Italy were vaccinated with a new Leishmania vaccine to see if it could protect them from a serious infection caused by sandflies. Unfortunately, after being exposed to the disease, a high percentage of the dogs still became infected, with many showing symptoms. The vaccine did not prevent the disease or stop it from getting worse in dogs that were already infected. Overall, the study found that this vaccine was not effective in protecting dogs from leishmaniasis.
People also search for: dog leishmaniasis vaccine effectiveness · symptoms of leishmaniasis in dogs · treatment for infected dogs with leishmaniasis
Abstract
We report results of a Phase III trial of the multi-subunit recombinant Leishmania polyprotein MML for the protection of dogs against infection by Leishmania infantum. The antigen, also known as Leish-111f, is the first antileishmanial human vaccine entered Phase I clinical testing. The study was performed in a leishmaniasis endemic area of southern Italy. Three groups of 15 Leishmania-free beagle dogs each, received 3 monthly injections with vaccines A (MML+MPL-SE adjuvant), B (sterile saline = control) and C (MML+Adjuprime adjuvant), respectively, before transmission season 2002. The surviving dogs received a second three-dose vaccine course 1 year later. The dogs were naturally exposed to sandfly bites for 2.5 months in 2002, and for 5 months in 2003. Every 2 months post vaccination, dogs were examined by clinical and immunological evaluation, and by specific serology, microscopy, culture and PCR. A weak lymphoproliferative response to MML was seen in A and C groups throughout the study period. One year after the first vaccine course, the cumulative incidence of leishmanial infections was 40% in group A, 43% in group B and 36% in group C. Two-year post-vaccination (1 year after the second vaccine course) the cumulative incidence was 87% in group A (with three symptomatic cases), 100% in group B (with no symptomatic cases) and 100% in group C (with two symptomatic cases). The efficacy of the MML vaccine as an immunotherapeutic agent for the prevention of disease progression (subpatent infection-->asymptomatic patent infection-->symptomatic patent infection) was evaluated through follow-up of dogs found infected prior to the second vaccination. Among 15 infected animals, progression to a subsequent stage of infection was found in 5/6 dogs of group A, 3/6 of group B and 2/3 of group C. We conclude that vaccination with MML is not effective to prevent leishmaniasis infection and disease progression in dogs under field conditions.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16054272/