PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Imidocarb and toltrazuril treatments fail in dogs with Hepatozoon

By De Tommasi, Anna Sara et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2014·Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Failure of imidocarb dipropionate and toltrazuril/emodepside plus clindamycin in treating Hepatozoon canis infection.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs infected with Hepatozoon canis, a parasite spread by ticks, were treated with two different medication combinations to see if they could clear the infection. The treatments included imidocarb dipropionate and a combination of toltrazuril/emodepside with clindamycin. Unfortunately, while some dogs showed a decrease in infection levels, neither treatment completely eliminated the parasite. This suggests that new treatment options are needed for dogs suffering from this infection.

People also search for: dog Hepatozoon canis treatment · tick-borne infections in dogs · Hepatozoonosis symptoms in dogs

Abstract

Hepatozoonosis caused by Hepatozoon canis (Eucoccidiorida, Hepatozoidae) is among the most widespread vector-borne infections of dogs, primarily transmitted by Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks. Based on the absence of a consensus on the treatment regimes for canine hepatozoonosis, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of imidocarb dipropionate (5-6 mg/kg subcutaneously once a week for 6 weeks), and of toltrazuril/emodepside (Procox(®), 15 mg/kg once a day for 6 days) in association with clindamycin (15 mg/kg once a day for 21 days) in treating naturally infected dogs. At the enrollment time (T0), 32 dogs, cytologically or molecularly positive for H. canis, were assigned to test and control groups. Animals were treated according to the specific therapeutic protocol, and the presence of H. canis gamonts was assessed weekly by cytology and PCR throughout six months (T1-T19). In addition, any abnormality in leucocyte morphology was evaluated and recorded. Results indicate that, in spite of a reduction in the percentage of infected dogs, both treatments did not provide parasitological cure. Accordingly, new treatment protocols or active compounds against H. canis should be investigated.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24439769/