PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Fine-needle biopsy helps diagnose ear canal masses in cats

By De Lorenzi, Davide et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2005·Clinica Veterinaria S Marco, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Fine-needle biopsy of external ear canal masses in the cat: cytologic results and histologic correlations in 27 cases.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 25 cats with masses in their ear canals underwent fine-needle biopsy to help diagnose the issue. The biopsies provided clearer results than swabs alone, allowing veterinarians to identify conditions like inflammatory polyps and tumors. The study found that this method was very effective, especially in distinguishing between benign and malignant growths. While the biopsy results were reliable, the researchers still recommend further testing for a definitive diagnosis of tumors.

People also search for: cat ear canal mass diagnosis · cat ear tumor treatment · why is my cat shaking head · cat ear polyp symptoms

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cytologic diagnosis of ear canal tumors is difficult or impossible by swab alone because cell exfoliation may be poor and neoplastic cells may be masked by associated inflammation. Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) can be used to obtain a higher yield of cells for diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and diagnostic value of FNB and cytologic examination in providing an accurate diagnosis of masses growing in the external ear canal of cats. METHODS: Cytologic specimens from masses in the external ear canal, taken under inhaled, general anesthesia, were classified into 4 groups: 1) ceruminous gland hyperplasia or adenoma, 2) ceruminous gland adenocarcinoma, 3) inflammatory polyps, and 4) other neoplastic and non-neoplastic masses. Cytopathologic diagnoses were compared with the final histopathologic diagnoses, and indices of diagnostic test accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic-odds ratios) were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven masses (from 25 cats, including 2 cats affected bilaterally) were included in the study. The results showed good correspondence between cytologic and histologic diagnoses with an overall agreement index (kappa) of .74, a diagnostic odds ratio of 22, and 100% (27/27) agreement in the diagnosis of inflammatory polyps versus neoplasia (both benign and malignant). CONCLUSIONS: FNB cytopathology of external ear masses in the cat was sufficiently accurate for distinguishing inflammatory polyps from neoplasia. For differentiation of benign proliferation and malignant neoplasia, however, histopathologic confirmation is recommended.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15902659/