PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

IgG and phosphatidylserine in dogs with immune anemia types

By Cynthia A. Lucidi et al.·Published in Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine·2021·Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA, GB·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Immunoglobulin G and phosphatidylserine in regenerative and nonregenerative immune‐mediated anemias of dogs

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with immune-mediated anemia were studied to understand how their immune system was affecting their red blood cells. In particular, researchers found that dogs with a specific type of anemia called precursor-targeted immune-mediated anemia (PIMA) had higher levels of certain proteins (IgG and phosphatidylserine) that could lead to the destruction of their red blood cells. The findings suggest that these proteins might play a role in worsening the anemia. While the study didn't focus on treatments, understanding these mechanisms could help veterinarians develop better therapies for affected dogs in the future.

People also search for: dog immune-mediated anemia treatment · why is my dog anemic · PIMA in dogs symptoms

Abstract

Abstract Background Although precursor‐targeted immune‐mediated anemia (PIMA) is thought to be caused by immune targeting of erythroid precursors (nucleated RBCs, nRBCs), its pathogenesis is unknown. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) or phosphatidylserine (PS) may promote nRBC destruction in PIMA. Hypothesis Dogs with PIMA have increased nRBC IgG and PS, and dogs with immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) have increased RBC PS compared to healthy dogs. Animals Blood from 20 healthy dogs and from dogs with IMHA (11) or other (non‐IMHA) conditions (9), and marrow aspirates with or without blood from 10 healthy dogs and from dogs with PIMA (17) or other (non‐IMHA, non‐PIMA) conditions (7). Methods Marrow nRBC stages were separated by density gradient. Flow cytometry was used to assess the percentage of RBCs or nRBCs with increased IgG or PS. Results Red blood cell (RBC) IgG positivity was increased in 9/11 IMHA dogs and 0/9 non‐IMHA dogs. Red blood cell PS positivity was increased in 10/11 IMHA dogs and 2/9 non‐IMHA dogs. Five of 17 PIMA dogs had increased nRBC IgG positivity in mid‐ or late‐stage fractions, whereas all 7 non‐PIMA dogs were negative. Mid‐ and late‐stage erythroid precursor PS was significantly higher in PIMA dogs compared to healthy dogs. Five of 14 PIMA dogs had increased RBC IgG positivity. Conclusions Immunoglobulin G and PS may promote destruction of nRBCs in PIMA dogs; PS may promote destruction of RBCs in IMHA dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16278