PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New vaccine protein shows promise against canine visceral

By Pessoa-E-Silva, Rômulo et al.·Published in Frontiers in immunology·2020·Department of Microbiology, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Immunoprophylactic Potential of a New RecombinantAntigen for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis: AnFinding.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs was tested for their immune response to a new potential vaccine against canine visceral leishmaniasis, a serious disease caused by parasites. Researchers found that one of the proteins, Lci13, significantly boosted the immune response in healthy dogs, suggesting it could help protect them from the disease. The study showed that Lci13 increased important immune markers and produced more nitric oxide, which helps fight infections. While further testing is needed, these findings are promising for developing a vaccine to prevent this illness in dogs.

People also search for: dog leishmaniasis vaccine · canine visceral leishmaniasis treatment · Lci13 protein for dogs

Abstract

The development and application of safe and effective immunoprophylactic/immunotherapeutic agents against canine visceral leishmaniasis (CanL) have been pointed out as the only means for the real control of the disease. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate thecellular immune response of dogs, elicited by the new recombinant proteins of, Lci10 and Lci13, in order to investigate their potential for vaccinology. Twenty-four dogs were submitted to clinical, parasitological, serological and molecular tests, and then separated into two study groups: 12 infected (InD) and 12 non-infected dogs (NInD), and six of each group were directed for Lci10 and Lci13 evaluation. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were cultured and stimulated with Lci10 (10 μg/ml) or Lci13 (5 μg/ml), and withsoluble antigen (LSA) (25 μg/ml) or no stimulus (NS) as controls. Afterwards, the mRNA levels of different cytokines were quantified through qPCR, and Nitric Oxide (NO) production was assessed in the culture supernatants. Significant differences were considered when p ≤ 0.05. The comparative analysis revealed that, in the NInD group, Lci13 promoted a significant increase in the expression of IFN-γ in relation to LSA (= 0.0362), and the expression of this cytokine in NInD was significantly higher than that presented in the InD (= 0.0028). A negative expression for TGF-β was obtained in both groups. Lci13 also induced a greater production of NO in relation to the NS sample in the NInD group. No significant differences were observed after stimulation with Lci10. In conclusion, the results suggest a protective role of Lci13 for uninfected animals, thus with a potential for immunoprophylaxis. The results will help to direct the antigen Lci13 for further studies (pre-clinical trials), in order to determine its immunogenicity and reactogenicity effects, as a way to consolidate its real applicability for vaccinology against CanL.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33488607/