PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Anaplasma infection in cats in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland

By Schäfer, Ingo et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2022·LABOKLIN, Germany·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: in domestic cats from Germany, Austria and Switzerland and clinical/laboratory findings in 18 PCR-positive cats (2008-2020).

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

Eighteen cats in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland tested positive for a tick-borne infection that can cause serious health issues. The most common symptoms noticed by their owners included lethargy, fever, and low platelet counts. Many of these cats had other health problems, but over half of them recovered after treatment. It's important for pet owners to be aware of this infection, especially if their cat shows signs of being unwell after a tick bite. Regular tick prevention is recommended to help keep cats safe year-round.

People also search for: cat lethargy fever tick infection · cat low platelet count treatment · how to prevent ticks on cats

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: is considered the most significant rickettsial pathogen affecting cats. The organism is transmitted by ticks of the speciesin Central Europe and can cause granulocytic anaplasmosis in pets, wildlife and humans. The aims of this study were to assess the frequency of positive test results forin cats in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, as well as to evaluate clinical and laboratory findings in cats with positive PCR results. METHODS: This study included the results of direct (PCR) and indirect detection methods (immunofluorescence antibody tests [IFAT]) requested by veterinarians in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between 2008 and 2020 from the LABOKLIN laboratory (Bad Kissingen, Germany). The veterinarians treating the PCR-positive cats were contacted by telephone to enquire about their clinical signs, laboratory findings, management and outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 244/1636 cats (15%) tested positive by direct (PCR: n = 27/725 [4%]) and/or indirect detection methods (IFAT: n = 221/956 [23%]). In 18/26 cats with PCR results positive for, additional information about clinical signs, laboratory findings, treatment and outcome was obtained. Of these 18 cats, five had comorbidities independent of their infection with. The most common clinical signs in PCR-positive cats (total/without comorbidities) were lethargy (83%/92%), fever (83%/85%) and thrombocytopenia (61%/62%). Overall, more than half (57%) of the cats with and without comorbidities recovered clinically. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Infections withshould be considered as differential diagnoses in cats with tick infestation, lethargy, fever and thrombocytopenia. The clinical signs and laboratory findings are consistent with published case reports in cats. Ectoparasite prophylaxis in cats is recommended throughout the entire year.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34076536/