Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Coccidioides infection rates in young dogs in Arizona
By Shubitz, Lisa E et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2005·Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Incidence of coccidioides infection among dogs residing in a region in which the organism is endemic.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of young dogs living in Arizona were tested for a fungal infection called Coccidioides, which is common in that area. Out of the dogs studied, about 27% developed antibodies indicating they had been exposed to the fungus, but only a small number showed signs of illness. Most of the infected dogs remained healthy without any symptoms. This suggests that while many dogs may get infected, only a few will actually become sick. If you live in an area where Coccidioides is common, it’s important to keep an eye on your dog for any unusual symptoms, but many dogs may not show any signs at all.
People also search for: dog Coccidioides infection symptoms · Arizona dog health issues · puppy fungal infection signs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of Coccidioides infection among dogs residing in a region in which the organism is endemic (Pima and Maricopa counties, Arizona) and estimate the rate of clinical illness. DESIGN: Community-based longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. ANIMALS: 124 healthy 4- to 6-month-old seronegative puppies (longitudinal study) and 381 4- to 18-month-old dogs with unknown serostatus (cross-sectional study). PROCEDURE: Dogs in the longitudinal study were tested at 6-month intervals for at least 1 year for anticoccidioidal antibodies. Dogs that became ill were evaluated for coccidioidomycosis. Dogs in the cross-sectional study were tested for anticoccidioidal antibodies once, and clinical abnormalities were recorded. RESULTS: 28 of the 104 (27%) dogs that completed the longitudinal study developed anticoccidioidal antibodies. Thirty-two of the 381 (8%) dogs in the cross-sectional study had anticoccidioidal antibodies. Five seropositive dogs in the longitudinal study and 13 seropositive dogs in the cross-sectional study had clinical signs of disease. The remaining seropositive dogs were otherwise healthy and were classified as subclinically infected. Survival analysis indicated that the cumulative probability of infection by 2 years of age was 28%, and the cumulative probability of clinical infection by 2 years of age was 6%. Titers for clinically and subclinically infected dogs overlapped. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that young dogs living in the study area had a high likelihood of becoming infected with Coccidioides spp, but few developed clinical illness. Serologic testing alone was insufficient for a diagnosis of clinical disease because of the overlap in titers between clinically and subclinically infected dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15938056/