Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Intrathecal substance P-saporin relieves bone cancer pain in dogs
By Brown, Dorothy Cimino & Agnello, Kimberly·Published in Anesthesiology·2013·Department of Clinical Studies - Philadelphia, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Intrathecal substance P-saporin in the dog: efficacy in bone cancer pain.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 70 dogs with bone cancer pain received either standard pain relief or an additional treatment called substance P-saporin (SP-SAP) injected into their spine. While the initial results at two weeks were unclear, dogs treated with SP-SAP showed better long-term pain management. Only 24% of these dogs needed changes to their pain treatment or euthanasia within six weeks, compared to 74% in the control group. This suggests that SP-SAP can help manage chronic pain in dogs with bone cancer without causing additional pain issues.
People also search for: dog bone cancer pain treatment · substance P-saporin for dogs · managing pain in dogs with cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Substance P-saporin (SP-SAP), a chemical conjugate of substance P and a recombinant version of the ribosome-inactivating protein, saporin, when administered intrathecally, acts as a targeted neurotoxin producing selective destruction of superficial neurokinin-1 receptor-bearing cells in the spinal dorsal horn. The goal of this study was to provide proof-of-concept data that a single intrathecal injection of SP-SAP could safely provide effective pain relief in spontaneous bone cancer pain in companion (pet) dogs. METHODS: In a single-blind, controlled study, 70 companion dogs with bone cancer pain were randomized to standard-of-care analgesic therapy alone (control, n=35) or intrathecal SP-SAP (20-60 µg) in addition to standard-of-care analgesic therapy (n=35). Activity, pain scores, and videography data were collected at baseline, 2 weeks postrandomization, and then monthly until death. RESULTS: Although the efficacy results at the 2-week postrandomization point were equivocal, the outcomes evaluated beyond 2 weeks revealed a positive effect of SP-SAP on chronic pain management. Significantly, more dogs in the control group (74%) required unblinding and adjustment in analgesic protocol or euthanasia within 6 weeks of randomization than dogs that were treated with SP-SAP (24%; P<0.001); and overall, dogs in the control group required unblinding significantly sooner than dogs that had been treated with SP-SAP (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Intrathecal administration of SP-SAP in dogs with bone cancer produces a time-dependent antinociceptive effect with no evidence of development of deafferentation pain syndrome which can be seen with neurolytic therapies.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24195949/