Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How ampicillin/sulbactam works in critically ill dogs after IV
By Goggs, Robert et al.Ā·Published in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeuticsĀ·2025Ā·Department of Clinical Sciences, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed ā
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research ā every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work ā
Original publication title: Intravenous Ampicillin/Sulbactam in Critically Ill Dogs has Variable Pharmacokinetics.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 25 critically ill dogs received intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam to treat their infections. The study found that while the dosage given was effective for some bacterial infections, it might not work well against certain resistant bacteria. Specifically, the treatment was likely to achieve the necessary drug levels for most cases, but there was a low chance it would be effective against more resistant strains. This means that while the medication can help, it may not be the best choice for all infections in very sick dogs.
People also search for: dog infection treatment Ā· ampicillin sulbactam for dogs Ā· critically ill dog antibiotics
Abstract
Achieving therapeutic plasma concentrations is essential for effective antimicrobial drug (AMD) treatment. Critical illness alters drug distribution and clearance, potentially impacting AMD effectiveness. We conducted a prospective observational study in 25 critically ill dogs to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous (IV) ampicillin/sulbactam and achievement of the efficacy target of ≥ 50% of the dosing interval with unbound plasma drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC). All dogs received IV ampicillin/sulbactam from a commercial formulation at a dosage of 20 mg/kg ampicillin/10 mg/kg sulbactam. Plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. PK modeling determined best-fit compartmental models, and Monte Carlo simulations evaluated the probability of target attainment for bacterial MICs. A one-compartment model best described ampicillin PK, while a two-compartment model fit sulbactam. Monte Carlo simulations indicated a 90% probability that ampicillin at 20 mg/kg IV q8 h would achieve the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) veterinary breakpoint of 0.25 μg/mL for > 50% of the dosing interval. There was only a 10% probability of achieving the human breakpoint of 8 μg/mL. At 0.25 μg/mL, most Enterobacterales isolates would be resistant. The ampicillin/sulbactam dosage tested meets veterinary CLSI standards for ampicillin but might not effectively treat Enterobacterales infections in critically ill dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases āOriginal publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40511602/