Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
No clear seasonal change in Leishmania infection in Spanish dogs
By Fernández-Bellon, H et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2008·Departament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Spain·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Little evidence of seasonal variation of natural infection by Leishmania infantum in dogs in Spain.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs in Spain was studied to see if the warmer months, when sandflies are active, led to more cases of Leishmania infection, which causes leishmaniosis. The researchers looked for signs of infection, like skin lesions and specific immune responses, in dogs during February and October. While some general signs of illness increased after the sandfly season, the actual infection rates and immune responses did not show significant changes between the two months. This suggests that the sandfly season may not greatly affect the prevalence of Leishmania infections in dogs.
People also search for: dog leishmaniosis symptoms · seasonal changes in dog infections · Leishmania treatment for dogs
Abstract
Leishmania infantum, the etiological agent of canine leishmaniosis in the Mediterranean region, is vectored by Phlebotomus spp sandflies, which are active during the warmer months of the year. In order to determine whether seasonality in transmission induces seasonal changes in the prevalence of infection by L. infantum and of parasite-specific immune response, two groups of dogs, one in February (n=37) and another in October (n=42), were studied. Clinical signs compatible with leishmaniosis, as well as presence of microscopic skin lesions in the muzzle were recorded for all dogs. Assays were also performed for detection of L. infantum parasites in muzzle skin samples (PCR, immunohistochemistry and culture), specific serum antibodies (ELISA), and specific lymphocyte proliferation and interferon-gamma production. Although prevalence of non-specific clinical signs increased significantly after the sandfly season, this was not the case for Leishmania-specific markers: positivity by PCR (24% vs. 21%) or immunohistochemistry (3% vs. 2%) of muzzle skin samples, as well as lymphocyte proliferation (59% vs. 50%) or interferon-gamma production (21% vs. 27%) were similar in February and in October. Only prevalence of positive specific antibody titers increased noticeably in October (8% vs. 20%), although this was not statistically significant. Overall, the sandfly season did not have a marked impact on the prevalence L. infantum infection or parasite-specific immune responses analyzed in this study.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18524491/