Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Kidney function in dogs after treatment for Cushing's disease
By Smets, P M Y et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2012·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Clinical Biology·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Long-term follow-up of renal function in dogs after treatment for ACTH-dependent hyperadrenocorticism.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 19 dogs with Cushing's syndrome (a condition caused by excess cortisol) were monitored for kidney function before and after treatment. They received either a medication called trilostane or a surgical procedure to remove part of the pituitary gland. While some kidney markers improved after treatment, a few dogs still had high levels of protein in their urine a year later, indicating ongoing kidney issues. This suggests that even after treating Cushing's syndrome, some dogs may need further evaluation for kidney health.
People also search for: dog Cushing's syndrome treatment · dog kidney problems after Cushing's · protein in urine in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systemic hypertension and proteinuria are frequent complications in dogs with Cushing's syndrome and do not always resolve after treatment of hypercortisolism. Therefore, dogs with Cushing's syndrome may be at risk for renal dysfunction before and after treatment. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To assess renal function in dogs with ACTH-dependent hyperadrenocorticism (ADHAC) before and after treatment. ANIMALS: A total of 19 dogs with ADHAC and 12 control dogs. METHODS: Renal function was assessed before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Twelve dogs were treated with trilostane and 7 dogs by transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. Routine renal markers were measured and urinary albumin (uALB), immunoglobulin G (uIgG), and retinol-binding protein (uRBP) were assessed by ELISA. Urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (uNAG) was determined colorimetrically. All urinary markers were indexed to urinary creatinine concentration (c). Plasma clearance of creatinine (Cl(creat)), exo-iohexol (Cl(exo)), and endo-iohexol (Cl(endo)) was used to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Data were analyzed using a general linear model. RESULTS: Serum creatinine and urea concentrations increased post-treatment, but remained within reference ranges. Plasma Cl(creat) and Cl(endo) were significantly lower post-treatment, whereas Cl(exo) was not different. Urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC), uALB/c, uIgG/c, and uRBP/c were decreased post-treatment, but at 12 months 5/13 dogs remained proteinuric. Urinary NAG/c did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A decrease in GFR and persistent proteinuria post-treatment may warrant the clinician's attention. Future research including renal histopathology of dogs with persistent proteinuria or low GFR is needed to further assess renal outcome.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22463105/