PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Mechanical strength of dog forearms with osteosarcoma tumors

By Steffey, Michele A et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2017·Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Mechanical properties of canine osteosarcoma-affected antebrachia.

Species:
dog
OsteosarcomaMovement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with osteosarcoma (a type of bone cancer) had their forelimb bones examined to see how the cancer affected their strength. The study found that the bones with cancer were more likely to break near the tumor, but they were still strong enough to support the dog's weight before amputation. This means that while the cancer weakened the bone, it didn't cause fractures until the limb was removed. Further research is needed to explore treatment options that could help dogs with bone tumors.

People also search for: dog osteosarcoma symptoms · dog bone cancer treatment · why is my dog limping after amputation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of neoplasia on the biomechanical properties of canine antebrachia. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Osteosarcoma (OSA)-affected canine antebrachia (n = 12) and unaffected canine antebrachia (n = 9). METHODS: Antebrachia were compressed in axial loading until failure. A load-deformation curve was used to acquire the structural mechanical properties of neoplastic and unaffected specimens. Structural properties and properties normalized by body weight (BW) and radius length were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Modes of failure were compared descriptively. RESULTS: Neoplastic antebrachia fractured at, or adjacent to, the OSA in the distal radial diaphysis. Unaffected antebrachia failed via mid-diaphyseal radial fractures with a transverse cranial component and an oblique caudal component. Structural mechanical properties were more variable in neoplastic antebrachia than unaffected antebrachia, which was partially attributable to differences in bone geometry related to dog size. When normalized by dog BW and radial length, strength, stiffness, and energy to yield and failure, were lower in neoplastic antebrachia than in unaffected antebrachia. CONCLUSIONS: OSA of the distal radial metaphysis in dogs presented for limb amputation markedly compromises the structural integrity of affected antebrachia. However, biomechanical properties of affected bones was sufficient for weight-bearing, as none of the neoplastic antebrachia fractured before amputation. The behavior of tumor invaded bone under cyclic loading warrants further investigations to evaluate the viability of in situ therapies for bone tumors in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28152185/