Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Minimally invasive ethanol treatment for head and neck cancer in cats
By Lai, Yen-Hao Erik et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative oncology·2021·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Minimally invasive ethyl cellulose ethanol ablation in domesticated cats with naturally occurring head and neck cancers: Six cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
Six cats with head and neck cancers, specifically squamous cell carcinoma in the mouth, were treated with a new method called ethyl cellulose-ethanol ablation (ECEA). This technique involves injecting a special solution directly into the tumor to help reduce its size without harming surrounding tissue. While some cats showed a decrease in tumor volume shortly after treatment, they also experienced side effects like pain and swelling at the injection site, and ultimately, all cats were euthanized due to worsening cancer and loss of tongue function. The study suggests that while ECEA may help reduce tumors, it is not a suitable treatment for this type of cancer in cats.
People also search for: cat mouth cancer treatment · squamous cell carcinoma in cats · ethyl cellulose ethanol ablation for cats
Abstract
It is difficult to retain tumoricidal doses of ethanol in large or unencapsulated tumours without causing intoxication or damaging surrounding tissue. Ethyl cellulose-ethanol ablation (ECEA) overcomes this limitation by trapping ethanol intratumorally. To evaluate the safety of ECEA and to develop a clinically feasible workflow, a single-arm pilot study was performed in cats with lingual/sublingual squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Six cats underwent intratumoral injection of 6% ethyl cellulose in ethanol. Subjects were observed overnight. There was mild bleeding and transient hyperthermia, and injection site pain and swelling that improved with anti-inflammatory drugs. Serum ethanol was minimally elevated; the mean concentration peaked 1 hour after injection (129 +/- 15.1 nM). Cats were rechecked at weeks 1 and 2; booster treatments were given in cats (n = 3) with stable quality of life and partial response to therapy. Recheck examinations were then performed monthly. The longest tumour dimension increased in each animal (progressive disease via cRECIST); however, estimated tumour volume was reduced in 3 of 6 cats, within 1 week of ECEA. All cats were euthanized (median survival time 70 days) because of local tumour progression and/or lingual dysfunction that was likely hastened by ECEA. ECEA is not a viable treatment for feline lingual/sublingual SCC; tumour volume was effectively reduced in some cats, but the simultaneous loss of lingual function was poorly tolerated. Further optimization may make ECEA a useful option for SCC at other oral sites in the cat, and for head and neck malignancies in other species.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33583138/