PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Tick bacteria Anaplasma and Ehrlichia infections in dogs in northern

By Pesapane, Risa et al.·Published in Veterinary microbiology·2019·Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Molecular detection and characterization of Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis in dogs from northern Colombia.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that 15.3% of dogs in northern Colombia were infected with Ehrlichia canis, and 20.2% had Anaplasma platys, both of which are tick-borne bacteria. The researchers tested dogs from veterinary clinics in Santa Marta and Ciénaga and discovered that some dogs were infected with both bacteria. Interestingly, purebred dogs appeared to be at a slightly lower risk of infection. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring these infections in dogs, as they could also pose a risk to humans.

People also search for: dog tick disease symptoms · Ehrlichia canis treatment for dogs · Anaplasma platys in dogs · how to prevent ticks on dogs

Abstract

Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma platys are intracellular tick-transmitted bacteria that infect dogs; there is evidence for limited zoonotic potential as well. The prevalence of E. canis in Colombia has been evaluated in different regions; however little is known about the prevalence or distribution of A. platys. Neither pathogen has been studied in the Magdalena region, thus the purpose of our study was to assess the prevalence of these pathogens in dogs attending veterinary clinics from the cities of Santa Marta and Ciénaga, and to assess possible associated risk factors for infection. A. platys and E. canis infections in blood were evaluated by Taqman PCR assays. E. canis was detected in 26/170 (15.3%, 95% CI 10.4%-21.8%) and A. platys in 34/168 (20.2%, 95% CI 14.6%-27.3%) of all dogs tested. Eleven dogs (6.5%, 95% CI 3.4-11.7%) were coinfected with both pathogens. Sequencing results showed low diversity within E. canis and within A. platys strains, however a strain of E. canis detected in our study area is genetically distinct from strains reported in another city of Colombia. Our results suggest that for A. platys, Santa Marta dogs were at greater risk than Ciénaga dogs, and that purebred dogs were at slightly lower risk in both areas. The confirmation of these pathogens in northern Colombia should cause concern for the possible co-transmission of these agents to humans or animals in the region.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31176406/