Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Tick-borne infections found in 5.4% of dogs in Turkey
By Aktas, Munir et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2015·Department of Parasitology·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Molecular detection of tick-borne rickettsial and protozoan pathogens in domestic dogs from Turkey.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study found that 5.4% of dogs in Turkey tested positive for tick-borne parasites, with the most common being Ehrlichia canis, which was present in 4.9% of the dogs. The research included 757 dogs of various ages and backgrounds, revealing that adult dogs were more likely to be infected than puppies. Pet dogs had a lower infection rate compared to stray and shelter dogs. While most of the dogs showed no symptoms, the presence of these parasites can be concerning for their health and the potential spread to other animals.
People also search for: dog tick-borne disease symptoms · Ehrlichia canis in dogs · how to prevent ticks on dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine tick-borne parasites have emerged in recent years, showing a wider geographic distribution and increased global prevalence. In addition to their veterinary importance, domestic dogs play an important role in the transmission cycles of some agents by acting as reservoirs and sentinels. This study investigated Babesia, Theileria, Anaplasma, and Ehrlichia species in asymptomatic dogs in ten provinces of Turkey. METHODS: DNA obtained from blood samples collected from 757 domestic dogs (243 stray, 351 shelter, 163 pet) of both sexes and various ages were evaluated using PCR and reverse line blotting (RLB) assays. RESULTS: Of the 757 dogs tested, 41 (5.4%) were found to be infected with one or more parasites. Ehrlichia canis (37/757, 4.9%) was the most common canine tick-borne pathogen, followed by Anaplasma platys (4/757, 0.5%). Babesia canis and Theileria annulata were each detected in 1 (0.13%) sample. Combined infection of E. canis and A. platys was detected in 2 (0.3%) samples. The prevalence of tick-borne pathogens was higher in adult dogs (6.8%) than in those under one year old (3.1%). Difference in infection rate of male and female dogs was not significant. Pet dogs had a lower prevalence of infection (1.2%) compared to stray (7.4%) and shelter dogs (6%) although the difference between stray and shelter dogs was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Babesia canis, T. annulata, A. platys, and E. canis species were identified at the molecular level in dogs in several provinces of Turkey, with E. canis being the most common species among tick-borne pathogens. Detailed studies should be conducted regarding the existence and prevalence of B. canis and Dermacentor reticulatus in eastern Turkey.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25889911/