PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Oral calcitriol DN101 absorption tested in tumor dogs

By Rassnick, Kenneth M et al.·Published in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology·2011·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Oral bioavailability of DN101, a concentrated formulation of calcitriol, in tumor-bearing dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with tumors received either an intravenous or oral form of calcitriol, a vitamin D derivative that can help fight cancer. Some dogs had allergic reactions to the intravenous version, but the oral version was better tolerated. The study found that while the oral calcitriol had lower overall absorption compared to the intravenous form, it still reached levels that could be effective against tumors in some dogs. This suggests that oral calcitriol could be a safer option for treating cancer in dogs, although individual responses varied.

People also search for: dog cancer treatment calcitriol · oral vitamin D for dogs · tumor treatment in dogs · side effects of calcitriol in dogs

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-dose calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3)) has antineoplastic activity against a range of tumors and potentiates chemotherapeutic agents. In an earlier canine study, the MTD of intravenous (i.v.) calcitriol was 3.75 μg/kg, but polysorbate-associated hypersensitivity reactions were common. Use of commercially available oral calcitriol is limited by the absence of a formulation of suitable strength to allow administration of a reasonable number of caplets. This study evaluated the bioavailability of DN101, a concentrated oral calcitriol formulation specifically developed for anticancer applications. METHODS: An open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study was conducted. Dogs randomly received a single 3.75 μg/kg dose of calcitriol either i.v. or oral (as DN101), followed by cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)). Three weeks later, the alternate form of calcitriol was given prior to another dose of cisplatin. Dogs received antihistamines and corticosteroids prior to both treatments. Food was withheld for 12 h before and after therapy. Serum calcitriol concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Ten tumor-bearing dogs received both i.v. and oral calcitriol. Six dogs experienced hypersensitivity reactions during i.v. calcitriol. Sequence of calcitriol administration (day-1 vs. day-21) by either i.v. or oral routes had no effect on the major calcitriol pharmacokinetic parameters. Oral calcitriol resulted in significantly lower values for AUC (P = 0.05) and prolonged T (1/2) (P = 0.003) when compared to i.v. Calcitriol oral bioavailability was highly variable among dogs (mean ± SEM, 71 ± 12.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a high-dose formulation of calcitriol has a moderate bioavailability in dogs, but inter-individual variability in PK parameters is similar to that observed in people. With this bioavailability, serum concentrations of calcitriol that exhibit antitumor activity in a preclinical murine model were achieved in some dogs. Exploration of methods to minimize variation in calcitriol systemic exposure is warranted.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20306264/