Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Oral etoposide absorption in tumor-bearing dogs after one dose
By Flory, Andrea B et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2008·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Oral bioavailability of etoposide after administration of a single dose to tumor-bearing dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Eight dogs with tumors were given etoposide, a chemotherapy drug, either through an IV or orally to see how well it worked in each method. Some dogs had allergic reactions to the IV form, but none showed side effects from the oral version. However, the amount of etoposide absorbed when given orally was much lower and varied widely among the dogs. Because of this low absorption rate, using the oral form of etoposide isn't recommended as a regular treatment option.
People also search for: dog cancer treatment options · etoposide for dogs · chemotherapy side effects in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic disposition of etoposide when the IV formulation was administered orally to dogs. ANIMALS: 8 tumor-bearing dogs. PROCEDURES: An open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study was conducted. Dogs were randomly assigned to initially receive a single dose of etoposide (50 mg/m2) IV or PO. A second dose was administered via the alternate route 3 to 7 days later. Medications were administered before IV administration of etoposide to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Oral administration of etoposide was prepared by reconstituting the parenteral formulation with 0.9% NaCl solution and further diluting the reconstituted mixture 1:1 with a sweetening agent. Plasma samples were obtained after both treatments. Etoposide concentrations were measured with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay, and plasma etoposide concentration-time profiles were analyzed by use of noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: 4 dogs had hypersensitivity reactions during IV administration of etoposide. No adverse effects were detected after oral administration. Plasma etoposide concentrations were undetectable in 2 dogs after oral administration. Oral administration of etoposide resulted in significantly lower values for the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma etoposide concentration-versus-time curve, compared with results for IV administration. Oral bioavailability of etoposide was low (median, 13.4%) and highly variable among dogs (range, 5.7% to 57.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE-Vehicle-related toxicosis can limit the IV administration of etoposide in dogs. The parenteral formulation of etoposide can be safely administered orally to dogs, but routine use was not supported because of low and variable oral bioavailability in this study.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18828689/