PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Coombs test patterns help diagnose immune anemia in dogs

By Warman, S M et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2008·Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Pattern of Coombs' test reactivity has diagnostic significance in dogs with immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 65 anemic dogs with a positive Coombs' test (a test for immune-mediated hemolytic anemia) was studied to understand how different testing methods affected the results. It was found that some dogs would have been incorrectly considered negative if only one type of test was used at body temperature. The results showed that dogs with primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia were more likely to test positive with certain reagents, indicating that the testing method can significantly impact diagnosis. This information can help veterinarians choose the best testing approach for diagnosing this condition in dogs.

People also search for: dog anemia symptoms · Coombs' test for dogs · immune-mediated hemolytic anemia treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical significance of the pattern of Coombs' test reactivity in dogs with immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia. METHODS: Sixty-five anaemic dogs with a positive Coombs' test were included. Coombs' testing was performed at 4 and 37 degrees C with polyvalent canine Coombs' reagent and antisera specific for each of canine immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin M and complement factor C3. The impact of performing testing with only polyvalent antiserum at 37 degrees C was assessed. Chi-squared tests were used to compare Coombs' test reactivity in dogs with primary immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia (group A) and in dogs with concurrent/underlying disease (group B). Following Bonferroni correction, significance was set at P < or = 0.003. RESULTS: Eleven dogs would have been regarded as Coombs' negative had they been tested with polyvalent antiserum at 37 degrees C alone. Group A dogs were significantly more likely to be positive with polyvalent antiserum and/or anti-dog immunoglobulin G at 4 and/or 37 degrees C (P < or = 0.001) and tended to be less likely to be positive with anti-dog immunoglobulin M at 4 degrees C (P=0.040). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Testing of anaemic dogs with polyvalent Coombs' reagent at 37 degrees C was less sensitive than testing with monovalent reagents at 4 and 37 degrees C. The pattern of Coombs' test reactivity differed significantly between dogs with primary immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia and those with concurrent/underlying disease.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18844824/