Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Accuracy of rapid tests for diagnosing dog leishmaniasis in Argentina
By Salomón, Oscar D et al.·Published in Medicina·2020·Instituto Nacional de Medicina Tropical·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Performance of rapid tests for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis in Argentina.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study in Argentina looked at two rapid tests for diagnosing canine visceral leishmaniasis, a disease caused by the Leishmania parasite. The rK39 test and the dual path platform (DPP) test were evaluated for their accuracy in detecting the disease in dogs. Both tests showed high sensitivity, meaning they were good at identifying infected dogs, especially those showing symptoms. The DPP test performed particularly well, with a sensitivity of 98% in symptomatic dogs. These tests can help veterinarians diagnose leishmaniasis in dogs, but additional tests may be needed to confirm the infection and guide treatment effectively.
People also search for: dog leishmaniasis symptoms · rapid test for dog leishmaniasis · canine leishmaniasis treatment options
Abstract
To diagnose dogs infected by Leishmania infantum rK39 rapid diagnosis test is widely used in the Americas, while dual path platform (DPP) was recently adopted by Brazil. In this study we assessed the performance of rK39-RDT and DPP tests in recent urban transmission scenarios of Argentina. The sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with a sera panel and field samples, taken as true infected those from parasitological and/or PCR positive tests. Since none of these tests can be taken as a gold standard, the performance was also evaluated using Latent Class Analysis, a statistical modeling technique which allows to estimating sensitivity and specificity defining a latent class variable as the reference standard. The sensitivity of both tests in the panel was around 92% (symptomatic dogs 96%, asymptomatic 83%), while the sensitivity in field samples of rK39-RDT was 77%, and DPP 98% (mean in symptomatic dogs 89%, asymptomatic 82%). The specificity was similar for both tests and samples, around 98%. Therefore, these tests are acceptable for program dog population-based studies, as spatial stratification, focus intervention and follow up, and they could be used for individual screening and confirmation of clinical presumptive diagnosis in polysymptomatic dogs. The inability to discriminate between immunity and actual infectiousness suggest that a combination with other non-immunological based tests will be required for highly sensitive/specific diagnosis in order to targeting control measures in individual reservoirs from public health perspective, as for individual management from animal health perspective.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32282314/