Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Lidocaine after dog surgery for gut blockage pain and nausea
By Burns, Charlotte C et al.Ā·Published in American journal of veterinary researchĀ·2025Ā·Department of Large Animal Medicine, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed ā
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research ā every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work ā
Original publication title: Pharmacokinetics and effect of postoperative lidocaine infusions on pain and nausea scores in canine patients undergoing gastrointestinal foreign body surgery.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 24 dogs undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal blockages received either lidocaine infusions or a placebo after their operations to see if it would help with pain and nausea. Surprisingly, both groups had low pain and nausea scores, and there were no significant differences between them. However, more dogs in the lidocaine group needed extra pain relief, which was linked to higher nausea. Overall, the lidocaine did not improve recovery outcomes like pain, nausea, or hospitalization time.
People also search for: dog surgery recovery pain management Ā· lidocaine for dogs after surgery Ā· nausea in dogs after anesthesia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of postoperative lidocaine infusions on pain, nausea, hospitalization duration, incidence of vomiting and diarrhea, and opioid requirement in dogs undergoing exploratory laparotomies for foreign body obstructions. METHODS: 24 client-owned dogs with confirmed obstructive gastrointestinal foreign bodies underwent surgery with identical anesthetic protocols, including a 2 mg/kg lidocaine IV bolus followed by a continuous rate infusion of 3 mg/kg/h. After recovery, dogs were randomly assigned to receive either lidocaine (1.8 mg/kg/h) or saline placebo for 24 hours. Pain was assessed using the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale short form (CMPS-SF) and visual analog scale (VAS). Rescue analgesia with hydromorphone was administered when CMPS-SF scores reached 6. Nausea was scored using a nausea VAS. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: No differences were found in pain scores between the lidocaine and placebo groups (CMPS-SF, P > .160; VAS, P > .292). Both groups maintained pain scores below the rescue analgesia threshold. Nausea scores showed no significant differences (P > .119) but were higher in dogs requiring rescue analgesia (P = .017). No differences were observed in hospitalization time (P = .861), time to defecation (P = 1.0), or vomiting/regurgitation (P = .087). Significantly more dogs in the lidocaine group required rescue analgesia (P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative lidocaine infusions did not significantly reduce pain, nausea, hospitalization time, defecation, or vomiting/regurgitation. Pain and nausea scores in both groups were overall low. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hydromorphone rescue analgesia increased nausea, suggesting careful monitoring of pain and nausea to prevent hydromorphone overuse.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases āOriginal publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40602623/