PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How common is Ehrlichia canis infection in dogs with low platelets

By Macieira, Daniel de Barros et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2005·Departamentos de Patologia e Cl&#xed, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Prevalence of Ehrlichia canis infection in thrombocytopenic dogs from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs in Rio de Janeiro with low platelet counts (thrombocytopenia) were tested for Ehrlichia canis infection, which can cause serious health issues. Out of 226 dogs, 36 with low platelet counts tested positive for the infection, while only 4 without low platelet counts did. This suggests that while there is a higher chance of finding Ehrlichia canis in dogs with low platelets, not all such dogs are infected. Therefore, low platelet counts alone shouldn't be used to diagnose this disease.

People also search for: dog low platelet count causes · Ehrlichia canis symptoms in dogs · how to treat dog ehrlichiosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection with Ehrlichia canis causes a highly variable, multisystemic disease in dogs. Nevertheless, many clinicians in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, use the presence of only thrombocytopenia to make a presumptive diagnosis of E canis infection. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of E canis in thrombocytopenic dogs from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: Following DNA extraction of whole blood samples from 226 dogs, PCR assays were done using primers for rickettsial DNA (including Ehrlichia spp, Anaplasma platys and A phagocytophilum) and using E canis-specific primers (16S rRNA gene). Dogs were grouped as thrombocytopenic and nonthrombocytopenic based on platelet counts. The null hypothesis that there was no difference in the prevalence of E canis in these groups was rejected at P<.05. RESULTS: Thirty-six (32.1%) of the thrombocytopenic dogs and 4 (3.5%) of the nonthrombocytopenic dogs were positive for rickettsial gene sequences (P<.0001). Further, 30 (26.8%) of thrombocytopenic dogs and 4 (3.5%) nonthrombocytopenic dogs were positive for E canis-specific gene sequences (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the prevalence of E canis infection was higher in thrombocytopenic dogs, less than one third of these dogs had demonstrable E canis infection. Thus, thrombocytopenia is not specific for the detection of E canis infection and should not be used solely to establish a diagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis, even in a geographic area with relatively high disease prevalence.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15732017/