Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Microorganisms linked to feline gingivostomatitis in cats
By Nakanishi, Hitoshi et al.Ā·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgeryĀ·2019Ā·Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, JapanĀ·View original on PubMed ā
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research ā every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work ā
Original publication title: Prevalence of microorganisms associated with feline gingivostomatitis.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats with painful mouth sores, known as feline gingivostomatitis (FGS), was studied to see if certain bacteria and viruses were more common in them compared to healthy cats. The researchers found that cats with FGS had a higher rate of feline calicivirus (FCV), a virus that can cause oral issues. While some bacteria were less common in FGS cats, others were found more frequently. This suggests that FCV might play a role in FGS, but more research is needed to fully understand the oral bacteria in these cats.
People also search for: cat gingivostomatitis treatment Ā· feline calicivirus symptoms Ā· cat mouth sores causes
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Feline gingivostomatitis (FGS) is a painful chronic inflammatory disease of the oral cavity. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of detection of certain common feline bacteria and viruses to determine any potential associations with FGS. METHODS: A multicentre case-control study design was conducted. In total, 72 control cats and 32 cats with FGS were included in the study. Oral swabs were cultured for bacterial identification and a PCR assay was carried out to examine the infection of feline calicivirus (FCV), feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1), Chlamydia felis, Mycoplasma felis and Bordetella bronchiseptica. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in age distribution between the control and the FGS group. Based on a PCR assay, the positive rate of FCV was significantly higher in FGS cats than control animals. For other infectious pathogens, including FHV-1, C felis and M felis, there was no significant difference. Bacterial culture of oral swabs revealed that Pasteurella multocida was most frequently detected, but the detection rate was significantly lower in FGS cats. In FGS cats, the incidence of Enterococcus faecalis and anaerobic bacteria were more frequently isolated than in control cats. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study indicates that the positive rate of FCV was significantly higher in cats with FGS, and the microflora of the oral cavity of cats with FGS might be disrupted, although additional studies are required to compare the oral microbiome in cats of a variety of ages.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases āOriginal publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29504825/