PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Preventing chemo side effects with antibiotics in dogs with lymphoma

By Chretin, J D et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2007·Tufts University, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfadiazine during chemotherapy in dogs with lymphoma and osteosarcoma: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with lymphoma or osteosarcoma (a type of bone cancer) received either a placebo or a medication called trimethoprim-sulfadiazine for 14 days after their first chemotherapy treatment with doxorubicin. The dogs that received the medication had fewer hospital visits and experienced less severe side effects, such as gastrointestinal issues and overall toxicity. This suggests that using trimethoprim-sulfadiazine can help improve the quality of life for dogs undergoing chemotherapy for these cancers.

People also search for: dog lymphoma treatment · osteosarcoma chemotherapy side effects · trimethoprim-sulfadiazine for dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The administration of chemotherapy is associated with risk for morbidity. Management of chemotherapy-related morbidity in veterinary oncology has been primarily supportive. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic antimicrobial use on chemotherapy-associated morbidity in dogs with lymphoma or osteosarcoma. ANIMALS: Dogs presenting with histologically confirmed osteosarcoma or lymphoma were eligible. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive placebo or trimethoprim-sulfadiazine for 14 days after their first doxorubicin chemotherapy. Both owner and clinician were blinded with respect to treatment. Patient assessment included CBC, physical examination and performance, and toxicosis grading on days 7 and 14. Investigated outcomes were hospitalization, suspicion of infection, gastrointestinal toxicity, neutropenia, nonhematologic toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Seventy-three dogs were enrolled; 34 had osteosarcoma, and 39 had lymphoma. Dogs receiving trimethoprim-sulfadiazine (n = 36) had a significantly reduced hospitalization rate (P = .03), nonhematologic toxicity (P = 0.039), grade 2-4 nonhematologic toxicity (P < .0001), grade 2-4 gastrointestinal toxicity (P = .007). and altered performance (P = .015). By group, dogs with osteosarcoma (n = 34) that received the antimicrobial experienced fewer occurrences of nonhematologic toxicity (P = .02) and less severe nonhematologic toxicity (P = .038). Dogs with lymphoma (n = 39) had significant reductions in the occurrence of hospitalization (P = .035), severity of nonhematologic toxicity (P = .036), and alterations of performance (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: The use of prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfadiazine has benefit in reducing morbidity in dogs with osteosarcoma or lymphoma during the first 14 days after treatment with doxorubicin.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17338162/