PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Chest wall reconstruction outcomes after rib tumor surgery in 44 dogs

By Liptak, Julius M et al.Ā·Published in Veterinary surgery : VSĀ·2008Ā·Animal Cancer Center and Department of Microbiology, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed →

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Reconstruction of chest wall defects after rib tumor resection: a comparison of autogenous, prosthetic, and composite techniques in 44 dogs.

Species:
dog
OsteosarcomaBreathing & coughDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 44 dogs with tumors affecting their chest wall underwent surgery to remove the tumors and reconstruct the chest area. The dogs were treated using different methods: some had muscle flaps taken from their own bodies, while others had prosthetic mesh or a combination of both. After surgery, about 18% of the dogs experienced early complications like fluid buildup, but overall, the use of muscle flaps led to fewer issues compared to the prosthetic mesh alone. The study suggests that using muscle flaps or a mix of techniques can help reduce complications after surgery for chest wall defects.

People also search for: dog chest wall tumor surgery Ā· chest wall reconstruction complications in dogs Ā· dog rib tumor treatment options

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare short- and long-term outcome and complications of chest wall reconstruction in dogs using autogenous, prosthetic, and composite autogenous-prosthetic techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort. ANIMALS: Dogs (n=44) with spontaneous tumors arising from or involving the chest wall. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for dogs with rib and/or sternal tumors treated by chest wall resection and reconstruction. Signalment, preoperative clinical features, intraoperative findings and complications, reconstruction technique (autogenous muscle flap, prosthetic mesh, or composite autogenous-prosthetic technique), and short- (< or =14 days) and long-term (>14 days) postoperative complications were determined from the medical records and telephone contact with owners and referring veterinarians. Associations between chest wall reconstruction technique and postoperative complications were tested with Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Chest wall defects were reconstructed with autogenous muscle flaps (29 dogs), prosthetic mesh (3), and a composite technique of prosthetic mesh and either autogenous muscle or omental pedicle flap (12). Early postoperative complications were recorded in 8 dogs (18.2%) and included seroma (5) and pleural effusion and peripheral edema (3). One dog had a late complication (2.3%) with a mesh-related infection 767 days postoperatively. Overall, complications occurred in 10.3% of autogenous, 25.0% of composite, and 66.7% of prosthetic reconstructions. Chest wall reconstruction with Marlex mesh alone was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications compared with autogenous reconstruction (P=.027). Reconstruction of sternal defects (3), 2 of which were performed with Marlex mesh alone, was associated with a significantly increased risk of complications compared with lateral chest wall reconstructions (P=.037). CONCLUSIONS: Large chest wall defects can be reconstructed with autogenous and composite techniques, but prosthetic mesh should be covered with well-vascularized autogenous muscle or omentum to decrease the risk of postoperative complications. Sternal defects should be reconstructed with rigid techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Chest wall reconstruction with autogenous muscle flaps or a combination of autogenous techniques with prosthetic mesh is associated with a low rate of infection and other complications.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18986316/