Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Regional citrate anticoagulation for dog hemodialysis safety and use
By Francey, T & Schweighauser, A·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2018·Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Regional Citrate Anticoagulation for Intermittent Hemodialysis in Dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 172 dogs with acute kidney injury underwent hemodialysis, and researchers tested a new method called regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) to avoid complications from traditional blood thinners. This method was found to be safe and effective, with 92% of treatments successfully preventing clotting without the use of heparin, which is important for dogs that might bleed easily. Most dogs showed improvement in their kidney function, with significant reductions in waste products in the blood. Overall, RCA proved to be a promising alternative for dogs needing hemodialysis.
People also search for: dog kidney injury hemodialysis · heparin alternatives for dogs · regional citrate anticoagulation in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The traditional systemic heparinization used for anticoagulation in extracorporeal therapies may cause fatal complications in animals at risk of bleeding. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a protocol of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for intermittent hemodialysis in dogs. ANIMALS: A total of 172 dogs treated with hemodialysis for acute kidney injury. METHODS: In vitro titration was performed, adding trisodium citrate and calcium chloride to heparinized canine blood. A tentative protocol was used first in 66 treatments with additional heparinization and subsequently in 518 heparin-free treatments. Safety and adequacy of RCA were assessed based on clinical and laboratory monitoring, dialyzer pressure gradient, treatment completion, and visual scoring of the extracorporeal circuit. RESULTS: Addition of 1 mmol/L citrate to heparinized blood decreased the ionized calcium concentration by 0.23 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.30) and 1 mmol/L calcium increased it by 0.62 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.45-0.79). Heparin-free treatments were initiated with infusion of trisodium citrate (102 mmol/L) at 2.55 mmol/L blood and calcium chloride (340 mmol/L) at 0.85 mmol/L. Citrate and calcium administrations were adjusted in 27 and 34% of the treatments, respectively. Overall, anticoagulation was satisfactory in 92% of the treatments, with expected azotemia reduction in 95% (urea) and 86% (creatinine), stable dialyzer pressure gradient in 82%, and clean extracorporeal circuits in 92% of the treatments. Eighteen treatments (3.5%) were discontinued prematurely, 9 because of clotting and 9 for reasons unrelated to the RCA procedure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Regional citrate anticoagulation allows safe and efficient heparin-free hemodialysis in dogs at risk of bleeding.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29171099/