Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Response-based CHOP chemo improves survival in dogs with B-cell
By Sarah E Benjamin et al.·Published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology·2021·View original on Semantic Scholar →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Response-based modification of CHOP chemotherapy for canine B-cell lymphoma.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with B-cell lymphoma received a modified chemotherapy treatment called response-based CHOP (RBCHOP) to improve their chances of recovery. The dogs were monitored closely after their first round of chemotherapy, and those that showed a positive response continued on a tailored treatment plan. While most dogs had similar survival times with the first two treatment plans, those that did not respond well initially had significantly shorter survival times. This study suggests that adjusting chemotherapy based on early responses can help manage treatment better, but dogs that don’t respond early may have a poor prognosis.
People also search for: dog lymphoma treatment options · B-cell lymphoma in dogs · chemotherapy for dogs with cancer
Abstract
Despite high initial response rates, a subset of dogs with B-cell lymphoma responds less robustly to CHOP-based chemotherapy and experiences shorter survival. One hundred and four dogs with nodal B-cell lymphoma were treated with a response-based CHOP (RBCHOP) protocol modified based on response to individual drugs during the first chemotherapy cycle. Dogs achieving complete (CR) or partial response (PR) at week 3, following treatment with vincristine and cyclophosphamide, received RBCHOP 1 (n = 72), a protocol sequentially rotating vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin. Dogs without a detectable response at week 3 that subsequently achieved CR or PR following treatment with doxorubicin received RBCHOP 2 (n = 14), in which four doses of doxorubicin were given consecutively followed by vincristine and cyclophosphamide. Dogs that failed to respond at week 3 and then to doxorubicin at week 5 assessment were offered rescue chemotherapy (RBCHOP 3, n = 18). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival time (OST) were similar between RBCHOP 1 (PFS 210 days, OST 354 days) and RBCHOP 2 (PFS 220 days, OST 456 days), but significantly shorter for RBCHOP 3 (PFS 34 days, OST 80.5 days, P < 0.001). No presenting signalment nor hematologic variable differentiated patient cohort, however, dogs in RBCHOP 2 and RBCHOP 3 were more likely to have a lymphocytosis at diagnosis (P = 0.02 and 0.04 respectively). Protocol modification based on response during the first cycle resulted in similar toxicity profiles and outcomes to previously published variants of CHOP, and prognosis remained poor for dogs failing to respond during the first treatment cycle.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Semantic Scholar: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33729654