PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Liver damage risk in dogs after eating xylitol 2018-2022

By Lovell, Tyler et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2025·Department of Emergency and Critical Care, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Retrospective Evaluation of the Incidence and Risk Factors Associated With the Development of a Hepatopathy in Xylitol Ingestion: 95 Dogs (2018-2022).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 95 dogs that ingested xylitol, a sweetener toxic to pets, were evaluated for liver damage. Almost half of the dogs developed liver problems, especially those showing symptoms before arriving at the vet. Inducing vomiting helped reduce the risk of liver damage, and dogs with low potassium levels were more likely to develop issues. Fortunately, none of the dogs experienced severe liver failure. Treatment involved inducing vomiting and monitoring blood levels to prevent complications.

People also search for: dog xylitol poisoning symptoms · xylitol liver damage treatment · what to do if my dog eats xylitol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between patient history, clinical signs, decontamination methods, and initial point-of-care diagnostics and the development of hepatotoxicity in dogs with xylitol ingestion. DESIGN: Retrospective study between 2018 and 2022. SETTING: University veterinary teaching hospital and private practice emergency hospital. ANIMALS: Ninety-five dogs evaluated by a university veterinary teaching hospital and private practice hospital following xylitol ingestion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed; signalment, time of ingestion, dose of xylitol ingested, source of xylitol, clinical signs at the time of presentation, and decontamination methods including induction of emesis and administration of activated charcoal were recorded. Point-of-care diagnostics, including PCV and total plasma protein (TP), lactate, blood glucose (BG), and potassium concentrations, were recorded. In total, 47 dogs (49.5%) developed a hepatopathy, 48 dogs (50.5%) did not develop hepatopathy, and no dog developed evidence of hepatic failure. The dose of xylitol ingested was not associated with development of hepatopathy. Dogs that had clinical signs prior to presentation were 1.95 times more likely to develop a hepatopathy than dogs that did not have clinical signs prior to presentation (p = 0.0005). Emesis was induced in 77% of dogs, and dogs that had emesis induced were less likely to develop a hepatopathy than those in which emesis was not induced (p = 0.01). Hypokalemia on presentation was associated with the development of a hepatopathy (p = 0.0353). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between the development of a hepatopathy in dogs and clinical signs prior to presentation, lack of emesis, and hypokalemia on presentation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41056358/