Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using human myeloma response criteria to track multiple myeloma
By Moore, A Russell et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2021·Department of Microbiology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Retrospective evaluation of the use of the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria in dogs with secretory multiple myeloma.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 16 dogs diagnosed with multiple myeloma, a type of cancer affecting plasma cells, were monitored using specific tests to measure a protein called M-protein in their blood. The dogs received various chemotherapy treatments, and the study found that those with a significant reduction in M-protein levels lived longer. One dog achieved complete remission, meaning no detectable M-protein was found. The results suggest that tracking M-protein levels can help veterinarians assess how well the treatment is working and predict survival times for dogs with this condition.
People also search for: dog multiple myeloma treatment · dog cancer survival rates · how to monitor dog cancer progression
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for monitoring disease progression and response to treatment in humans with multiple myeloma include evaluation of serum paraprotein (M-protein) concentration. Densitometry, species-specific radial immunodiffusion (RID) and ELISA methods can be used to quantify M-proteins. OBJECTIVE: Retrospectively evaluate use of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria for humans in dogs with multiple myeloma. ANIMALS: Sixteen dogs with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma, M-protein documented by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IF) in an initial sample and subsequent electrophoretic evaluation of serial samples. METHODS: Retrospectively, densitometric M-proteins, RID and globulins were measured and characterized according to IMWG criteria. Available clinical history was reviewed. Overall survival time (OST) was calculated from initial electrophoretic evaluation to death or last contact. RESULTS: All cases received some form of nonstandardized chemotherapy. Complete response (CR), a lack of detectable M-protein by SPE and IF, was documented in 1 case. Median survival was longer for dogs that attained ≥90% densitometric M-protein reduction (630 days) than for those that did not attain at least 50% reduction in densitometric M-protein (284 days; log rank P = .006). Five dogs were defined as having progressive disease (M-protein increase of >25% and at least 0.5 g/dL from nadir), which correlated with concurrent or subsequent clinical deterioration. Response criteria categorized by serum globulins or RID was not correlated with OST or clinical findings. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Densitometric M-protein characterized using IMWG response criteria correlated with OST and clinical findings. Densitometric M-protein detection should be used to monitor dogs with multiple myeloma.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33215766/